who thinks that jack the ripper was prince albert vickys hubbie?

Question

its odd how couple of weeks a go i brought it up and now thay find some new papers odd that i think in 1880 scotland yard coverd it up that is why he was never found

yes it was 1888 i sliped up a bit with year the was a muder in sept 1888

the name of jack the ripper is kemisky found out today he was jewish

araron kosminski is the supect for jack in 1888 by scotland yard

Answer 1

The leading Policeman on the Jack the Ripper case believed him to be a Polish Jew named Kinski or Klinski ( can't remember which). The Policeman's diaries have just been released.

P.S. A possible reason he was not arrested (quietly disposed of, perhaps), could have been that there was a lot of anti-Jewish sentiment in London at that time and his arrest may have triggered a pogrom against the Jews

P.P.S. There was a phrase written on a wall, at one of the murder scene's, " THE JEWS WILL NOT BE BLAMED FOR NOTHING ". It was orderd to be rubbed out by a senior Police Officer.

Sorry I can't remember any of the names, but it did happen a long time ago.

Answer 2

Well, not many people do think that Queen Victoria's husband was Jack the Ripper as he died about twenty seven years before the killings began in 1888!!!!

I think the person that you are referring to is Prince Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence who was never a suspect at the time of the killings as he had public engagements ie dinners etc that corresponded with the killings. This theory wasn't put forward until around1970. This is simply a silly conspiracy theory. Jack the Ripper's identity will probably never be clear but there is primary source evidence which states the prime suspect was Aaron Kosminski, an East End Jew.

If you want to read about the Ripper the I suggest Donald Rumbelow's work. He's our top Ripper expert and very sensible.

Also have a look at this website.

http://www.casebook.org/

Answer 3

Dude, there have been conspiracy theories about that since the day after they happened, over 100 years ago. Some of the possible suspects:
-Prince Albert Victor
-the royal Physician
-a jew
-a butcher
-a jewish butcher
-a demon
-Sherlock Holmes
-a foreign agent, attempting to sow chaos

the list goes on. There are no new suspects in the case, and the mishandling of the inept and politically-charged Metropolitan Police Force at teh time probably destryed the possibility to discover the truth, much like the cops in Denver and the Jon benet Ramsay case.
I personally think that some of the cases were done by the Ripper, and some were copycats.

ps - the moron who stated that the message was about the "jewes" should perhaps read a book or two (or many, as he is apparently willing to jump to the anti-semitic answer alltoo quickly). The actual quote was "The JUWES Are The Men That Will Not Be Blamed For Nothing." Many people tend to think that the supposed misspelling of the plural of Jew was instead a reference to masonic tradition. this was covered in a surprisingly good graphic novel called From Hell. Check it out. It presents the Queen's Physician, William Gull as a syphilitic spree killer covering up for the Prince's indescretion with a common street walker and their resulting baby. A lot of claptrap.

Answer 4

Jack the Ripper was not any member of the British Royal Family (and certainly not Albert, as he was indisposed at the time) there was no Masonic connection, the artist Sickert was not involved, and Tumblety was in custody at the time of the last killing and therefore was unlikely to have done it.

Hope that clears up a few things. btw, what "new papers" would you be referring to? I'd be interested in reading about them.

fyi: The "new papers" are nothing of the sort. They were uncovered 25 years ago and have been studied thoroughly. Kosminski has been known to be a police suspect since the mid-fifties. All that happened is that the owner of the papers in question has donated them to the Scotland Yard Crime Museum. That's all.

edit: The Duke of Clarence was Victoria's grandson, not son.

Answer 5

Prince Albert, the Prince Consort, died over 20 years before the Jack the Ripper murders!

Also, why are some people so convinced that the Duke of Clarence was in any way involved in the murders? What tangible proof is there that even remotely links him to the murders? Also, if I remember correctly, I think that it has been said that he was gay, or at least bisexual.

Some time ago, some well-known FBI profilers were asked to do a profile of the killer. After they did their profile, they concluded that, of all the people suspected in the case, Aaron Kosminski was the mostly likely candidate.

Answer 6

well seeing as the Jack the ripper murders wer in 1888 a whole 8 years after 1880 I'm thinking that cover up didn't happen.
I think it was Francis J Tumblety
•He fled to the US after be arrested for gross indecency
•He had the medical knowledge to locate all the organs which the ripper tended to focus on when mutilating
•He had a collection of body parts in the US including Uteruses which were often a target of the ripper

Answer 7

I have heard this theory on Jack The Riper aswell, but in my opinion I think Jack The Ripper is a man cllaed Francis Tumbelty. All the evidence points to him, and fits the description. I am researching Jack The Ripper at the moment for a course I am doing, and I definatley think it was him. Many people have speculated that Jack The Ripper was a woman. Jill The Ripper? The police force in the nineteenth centry covered up many suspects on this case, and makes you wonder if they knew something we dont...........

Answer 8

They think the Prince Albert Victor grandson of Queen Victoria was Jack the Ripper.

Answer 9

I don't think so because Albert died 1861 and Jack the ripper killed between 1888-1891

Answer 10

Slightly mistaken, I fear - Prince Albert had been dead for some time when the Ripper murders happened. Perhaps you're thinking of the Duke of Clarence, Victoria's (second? third?) son ...