it was originally hypothised and proved by einstein..
2006-07-12 23:58:06 · 13 answers · asked by Ajay V 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
No, it has not been proved wrong that I know about. Do you have information on an experiment with results that disagree with E=MC2? If so, where is a link to a page about it?
2006-07-13 02:36:46 · answer #1 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Since the mean of mass has changed recently, there are no mass but just energy in some form which can be released using special techniques so i think that we have to do more researches about Einstein's formula
2006-07-13 00:40:33 · answer #2 · answered by a_ebnlhaitham 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not Yet for sure - it should be someone brainier than Einstein how could do that - may be another Buddha who is presumed to be very intelligent compared to normal human beings. At the moment, E = MC(2 - Squared) is true for everything around us.
2006-07-13 00:05:00 · answer #3 · answered by R G 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That theory is still viable today, and it is not likely that it will ever be changed. But it is not fact. Nothing in science is a fact; anyone who beleives that does not know anything whatsoever about science. A theory is not scientific unless it has the ability to be proven false.
2006-07-13 02:55:36 · answer #4 · answered by Grant H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No i'm no longer able to. it may mean changing the whole theory of at present's human race's understanding.. like changing physics and arithmetic itself. properly in case you provide me the authority to re define various issues, like theory of capability, algebric rules etc etc, perhaps i ought to do it for you !! and that's no longer any way much less ultimate till the which skill and the phenomena remains a similar. i will in all probability use some thing greater alluring, like a alluring youthful female's image to symbolize specific variables and a clean thank you to symbolize the whole equation.. perhaps, the particularly some intercourse positions could mean particularly some homes of nature.. like, missionary for at present's F=ma and ***** for E=mc^2...
2016-12-10 05:59:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, relativity itself implies that e = mc^2. it shows that energy is equal to mass into light's speed squared. it although was hypothetical but then after that he with his friend prooved that the equation is entirely prooven.
if it is wrong (as you think) then how can you say that how nuclear fusion and fission is possible? well, logically you are right(0.00000001 % ) that it was hypothetical. that shoudn't make any difference to my answer and your question.
2006-07-13 00:27:48 · answer #6 · answered by ankitd 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
do u think THAT ANYONE CAN BE MORE INTELLIGENT THAN EINSTEIN .THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THIS FORMULA .IT CAN PRACTICALLY AND THOERYTICALLY BE PROVED. IF YOU ARE THAT INTERESTED IN OPT. FOR STEVEN HAWKINGS ''A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME''.
2006-07-13 00:46:01 · answer #7 · answered by juhi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no till date it is not wrong this equqtion holds gud and is used in nucliar fusion and fission reactions
2006-07-13 00:17:56 · answer #8 · answered by manu 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the correct question would be
HAS e-mc3 been proved wrong?
Got grammar?
2006-07-13 00:02:04 · answer #9 · answered by * 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was not proved wrong, but was somehow improved..
2006-07-13 00:01:46 · answer #10 · answered by grifter_xiii 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋