We're actually working on WW IV.
WW III lasted from the moment that the CCCP blockaded Berlin (1948) and lasted until the wall between East and West Berlin came down. We won that because RWR stood up the Russian bullies.
WW IV started the moment the first plane hit the WTC North tower. Right now, there's a big hole in the ground just 25 miles east of me. I still miss the sight of the twin towers as I drive over the last ridge of the Watchung Mtns. Fortunately for me, no one I know was hurt or killed in that attack.
WW IV will end when the last Islamo-Fascist meets his 72 virgins in Islamic Paradise.
2006-07-13 01:11:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by SPLATT 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think if you look into the world history, problems constantly occur within the Middle East. I do believe World War III will begin in the Middle East and involve nearly every country, not just world powers, the next time around.
As far as how the world will divide itself, it will be the same as the other two World Wars, with USA, Britain and France being the "good guys" and then those countries in the Middle East that strike first the "bad guys". As far as whose sides Italy, Russia, Germany, Egypt, etc. will be on, it will probably be case specific, an example being Russia, as she fought on two different sides during the two different wars.
I also think the war will affect common citizens, such as you and I. It has already been pronounced that anyone is a target, the message of the London Bombings and the 9/11 attacks. But also, weapons of mass destruction are going to be a major threat now, becasue we know (or think we know) that other countries have the ability to make these nukes. The question then becomes, if everyone is to be involved, would you rather watch the war, or take part in ending the war and creating peace? I know I would want nothing more than my family, friends and loved ones to be safe, and if making a large effort is what needs to be done, then it will be done.
These are all my opinions, however. They all have been subjected to a feeble mind.
2006-07-12 21:40:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by decblackpsalm 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Israel vs Lebanon. The main divide is between Jewish and Christian fundamentalists vs Arab fundamentalists. However, any agression by the US toward Iran and/or Nth Korea would result in a fundamental shift of international opinion and you may find some of the US allies changing sides. China will not be a threat unless the US attacks Nth Korea or China itself. I do believe, however that the USA would not be stupid enough to attack China (or would they?). If the USA was to get into a war that it lost against the rest of the world (very unlikely) it would cease to exist, Texas would cede, etc etc. We live in hope (no only kidding... what I really wish is that the USA could go home and live within its own borders and that fundamentalist Arab nations would treat their women and working people more equitably... oh and that Israelis could feel secure enough to live in peace with those they have planted themselves on.) Unfortunately, there could be a major war brewing in the Middle East.
2006-07-12 22:07:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Trigger? U.S. intervention in international affairs.
Every part of the world has a certain conflict or situation:
-North Korea's missile test
-Israel fighting for its captured soldiers
-Afghanistan
etc..
And the U.S. always has some judgemental comment or plan to "take hands in the matter", as if this supposed "land of the free" were role model and sole harbinger of peace, freedom, and justice.
Mark my words:
The U.S. could very well face a 2nd civil war if the government continues to act as it has.
My other theory:
All those different industrialized countries, 3rd-world countries, rogue states, etc. from around the world might get sick of America's "diplomatic policies" and launch a joint strike against U.S. soil and maybe even *on* U.S. soil
(possibly attacking through land: Alaska, Canada, Mexico)
2006-07-12 21:28:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Exactly what has and is happening now could be the start of a 3rd World War. When you blame and set out to destroy nations and people you are provoking a response. I can see that the Zionists, who are supposed Christians and the Antichrist Israeli's, are oozing with joy as they systematically exterminate the Arabs. May God bring his wrath down upon these warmongers.
2006-07-12 21:31:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A religion that says that we kill and that the jewesh is the enemies of god and that u have to kill others that r not of ur religion would definatly trigger world war iii
2006-07-12 21:28:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by doudou_33 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
regrettably, WWIII will be global suicide, for this reason in answer on your question, as long as there is rational superpowers who position self assurance in MAD, there'll be no WW3. with the help of definition, the subsequent international conflict wil be nuclear, how ought to it not. In a nuclear conflict there'll be no winner. In a nuclear international, the in common words real enemy is conflict itself. the subsequent international conflict will contain a nuclear substitute, how ought to it not if each part believe no value for victory will be too extreme. in the first 0.5-hour, just about one thousand million people can were vaporised, often in the U. S., Russia, Europe, China and Japan. yet another a million.5 billion will die presently thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged soreness and barbarity. finally the nuclear wintry climate will spread to the southern hemisphere and all plant life will die. You ask what u . s . a . should be effective, you're asking even as can we dedicate global suicide. My answer is it gained't ensue quickly because the bigger superpowers are extra rational than the rump states in the midsection east. even as we listen communicate of a nuclear-Iran or a conflict of words with NorKor, little is declared about both bulls in the glass save. The arsenals of Russia and the U. S. are adequate to spoil a million Hiroshimas. yet there are fewer than 3000 cities on earth with populations of one hundred,000 or extra. you won't be able to locate some thing like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. correct militia and business aims that are a procedures from cities are somewhat uncommon. Our greatest probability is from an unintended launch with the help of the Russians. on the point of global suicide, it would not remember who's on what part.... In a nuclear age like i suggested earlier, the in common words real enemy is conflict itself.
2016-11-01 23:31:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by bulman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush
2006-07-12 21:23:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by cpinatsi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
North Korea will trigger it.
2006-07-12 21:22:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by /\ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
WWIII has started: it is all the mass histeria of people who think god exist and worse that there is a comparison of gods.
2006-07-12 21:22:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kreep 3
·
0⤊
0⤋