English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just because you have ONE little dream or a little thought of being with the same sex, doesn't nessesarily mean you're bi-curious..it just means your CURIOUS. Am I right? Anyone agree?


Now if you think about it let's say at least every other day, then maybe, but still.

2006-07-12 19:14:18 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender

Just an opinion.

2006-07-12 19:16:52 · update #1

8 answers

I agree. Either you are straight and curious, which pretty much everyone is, or you are bi. Do whatever you want, but the label just doesn't seem to fit. And sometimes it feels at though the "bi-curious" are giving us bisexuals a bad name.

2006-07-12 19:34:53 · answer #1 · answered by Maggie 6 · 14 4

Yeah totally.. If you think a girl is hot your "bi-curious" when really you just think she is attractive..
I think you could say you were Bi-curious if you set out to look to have a same sex encounter and then if you liked it and you did it more often with both men and women you would be bi-sexual.
I have only ever been with men.. but I fell for a woman and we have been together for 3 years.. Now if we broke up I would go back to men no questions asked.. so what does that make me lol.. Im not a lesbian because i am still very much attracted to men.. Really im not bi sexual because I dont find any other woman sexually attractive.. hmm what can I be called? 1 time bi-sexual lol

2006-07-12 19:20:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You said yourself...it means you are CURIOUS. But they call it bi-curious becuase you are curious to try things with both sexes. If you don't think you're quite bisexual, but you would like to try things out, that makes you bicurious. Thats the word for it. It's not being over used, it's being used in context.

2006-07-13 03:20:25 · answer #3 · answered by karolinka 4 · 0 0

That term is only asserting that our ancestors got here from Africa, no longer inevitably the human beings alive at present that are talked approximately as that. I do hate the observe Black(like crayon shade) in spite of the indisputable fact that, I mean technically, we are brown, and that i've got by no skill seen a individual that replaced into actual Black, I only think of it can be a darker shade of brown. i assume i ought to work out the place you're coming from in spite of the indisputable fact that, yet in basic terms slightly. as properly, its been occurring for this long, why replace it in basic terms to complicate issues. The solutions you get would be per individuality, which skill some human beings like it, and others do no longer. i don't be conscious of what to assert with regard to the whole count, I mean as long as that is not racial, then i'm cool with it.

2016-12-10 05:54:57 · answer #4 · answered by haden 4 · 0 0

Yes, it is quite fashionable for people to profess to being bi-curious - to the detriment of those who genuinely are bi-curious.

2006-07-12 21:34:23 · answer #5 · answered by unclefrunk 7 · 0 0

I'm okay with people using whatever word they feel describes themselves best. As a bisexual, I've been called all kinds of words that don't fit! We know what they mean, and the point of language is to communicate a concept.

2006-07-12 20:25:50 · answer #6 · answered by GreenEyedLilo 7 · 0 0

not at all. This is why they are asking questions. The have bi-sexual curious desires they need help with

2006-07-13 03:50:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

agree but its just a word, no big deal.

2006-07-12 19:18:13 · answer #8 · answered by †ᴰᴲᵛᴵᴸ† 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers