English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

The first one, because there was no hype. No teenyboppers in line screaming. No audience over-reactions. It was much better if only for that.

2006-07-12 19:16:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

one, because i have watched it 20,000 times.

but after seeing the second, i can honestly say....it was the closest to being better, that a sequel has ever been...

totally awesome..
and truly it may just be better...
let me watch it 20,000 times...and i will let you know for sure!!


Can't wait for 3 At Worlds End
coming in May, 2007

Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End

Release Date: May 25, 2007
Studio: Walt Disney Pictures
Director: Gore Verbinski
Screenwriter: Terry Rossio, Ted Elliott
Starring: Johnny Depp, Orlando Bloom, Keira Knightley, Stellan Skarsgård, Jack Davenport, Kevin R. McNally, Lee Arenberg, Mackenzie Crook, Andy Beckwith, Reggie Lee, Chow Yun-Fat
Genre: Action, Adventure, Comedy

2006-07-13 03:05:44 · answer #2 · answered by sparkalittlefire 4 · 0 0

i dont know really i honestly like how Keira likes Orlando in the first movie, but in the second she likes jack. and i dont like that. so um i have to say because of it being new and everything the second. thats because when a movie is new the person likes it better even thought the first one is way better. either way the second movie,

2006-07-13 02:18:12 · answer #3 · answered by Jane 2 · 0 0

I like BOTH! Johnny Depp is an amazing actor and was great in both of them.the first one was really cool and well-written and the second movie had alot of old and new faces and surprises.it's impossible to decide......for me.

2006-07-13 02:18:35 · answer #4 · answered by marley_lover 2 · 0 0

I liked the one with Oralndo Bloom in it better because Orlando Bloom was in it. I also liked the other one with Oralndo Bloom because that had Orlando Bloom.

2006-07-13 02:34:22 · answer #5 · answered by green123 3 · 0 0

both of them kick ***, but the second one has the anxiety to want to see the 3rd one desparately, and thats good directing so i gotta say part 2

2006-07-13 02:18:59 · answer #6 · answered by p-dogg 2 · 0 0

The first, because it wasn't so loooooong and drawn out. On deadman's chest I struggled to stay awake!

2006-07-13 02:15:43 · answer #7 · answered by Getsbetterwithtime 3 · 0 0

the first, because I hate the way the second ended....thats all i'll say in case people havn't seen it yet...

2006-07-13 02:17:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The first one, because it was fresh and new.

2006-07-13 02:14:23 · answer #9 · answered by Susie 6 · 0 0

NONE CANNOT STAND JOHNNY DEPP!!! WASTE OF TIME AND MONEY!!!

2006-07-13 02:26:17 · answer #10 · answered by jennifersuem 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers