1. Introduction - in which details like 'how the problem had been identified?', 'why the identified problem was given periority?', 'the work so far done regarding the identified problem', 'research gap', 'The main GOAL, AIM and OBJECTIVES' etc. should be given clearly.
2. Materials and Methods - Here you have to give what are all the research materials (like location, instruments, equipments, softwares etc. used in your research) you used. The standard methodolgies you adopted in your research have to be given elaborately.
3. Results - Here you have to give your research findings in terms of numerical values, statements etc. They should be in the form of tables, graphs, photographs etc. Here very important thing is your data should be statistically analysed for their significance.
4. Discussion - Giving your results are not sufficient, you have to discuss about your research findings. Here you have to correlate your research hypotheses with your findings, you have to give your justifications about your research findings. You have to compare your results with those of similar kind of research studies. You can give elaborate critisism about the related results of the other studies with the support of your own data.
5. Summary - Here you have to summarise your research findings in a nut shell. Here you have to give what is what. Every thing should be pin pointed.
6. Conclusion - The conclusion should coincide with your goal, aims, objectives etc. The conclusion should be strong. There should not be any confusion or dilemma. Even if you find any negative aspects or if your are not able to prove your research hypotheses, you do not bother. You give your real conclusion. This will pave way for your successor to get the solution for it.
2006-07-12 19:38:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by K.J. Jeyabaskaran K 3
·
1⤊
0⤋