English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Check these links out and tell us about it, please!
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/12/276083.shtml
http://www.iags.org/iraqpipelinewatch.htm
http://64.239.13.64/images/090705_BBC_Map.jpg
http://judicial-inc.biz/Operat23.jpg
http://judicial-inc.biz/pics/Phot0_68.jpg

2006-07-12 18:19:33 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

This wouldn't have anything to do with prior knowledge and telling lies to America would it? This was Reagan/Bush senior at work.

2006-07-12 18:29:10 · update #1

These links are still current and up to date if you will look real close. This is what is going on right now people.

2006-07-12 18:39:58 · update #2

19 answers

Excellent question Bill. I can see that you brought the proof with you.

2006-07-12 18:25:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 16 1

I saw you had posted a question Bill, these people don't know you have a PHD do they? You are always on top of the game. Great question to post. I can see that the current administration caused the problems America is in with Iraq. No declaration of war, and invasion without the approval of the U.N.. Haliburton and Carlyle are using American funds to maintain these pipelines with American lives. I think Bush needs impeached at first chance.

2006-07-12 19:07:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's all a big conspiracy by the liberals to make it look like he shook his hand but really it's not Rumsfeld, it's a double shaking Saddams hand, after Saddam found out of the ploy, he shot the double. The liberals covered it up Liberals also made it look like we landed on the moon, but we did'nt, it was all filmed in a liberal film studio. Oh and dinosaur fossils are a liberal ploy to make people think God does'nt exist, they built a time machine, genetically created dinosaurs, killed them and then planted them across the planet a hundred million years ago so it looks like they were always there. Watch the liberals, they have mighty powers we cannot fathom booooooooo

2006-07-12 18:41:33 · answer #3 · answered by JoeThatUKnow 3 · 0 0

They had a business agreement. It's that simple. Even back then we knew Saddam was a ruthless sob (we have friendly relations with the ruthless dictatorship in Angola) and what many of his inhumane tactics were.

Our secret agreement turned sour after Saddam took full power and decided not to honor his part of the deal.

It had nothing to do with politics or religion. It was a business deal between greedy American businessmen and an ego-driven nutcase.

The average American always pays dearly for someone else's greed.

2006-07-12 18:53:43 · answer #4 · answered by Doc Watson 7 · 0 0

convinced it really is, Rumsfeld has an massive quantity of blood on his fingers, inspite of each thing it replaced into Rummy who also replaced into on the board of a business enterprise that bought the nuclear reactors to North Korea that helped them create the gas for his or her Nuclear guns. It replaced into also Rummy who replaced into very influential lower back interior the Reagan administration that were given the deadly poison Aspartame surpassed by skill of the FDA as being in good structure for human intake. Rumsfeld is in charge for a large style of lack of life! i have self belief it replaced into in part because rumsfeld replaced into curious about promoting the sarin gas used on the Kurds that Saddam replaced into purely tried (and hung) for the deaths of 148 Iraqis who tried to assinate him. If Saddam were tried for the different great scale massacres then the completed international may have publicly bourne witness to the grimy bargains that Rumsfeld and the U. S. administrations the position as a lot as their necks in. How about gazing another video clips? i come round those taken in early 2001 the position Condi Rice and Colin Powell declare that Saddam isn't achievable, that Saddam had not re-constituted his WMD programmes or protection rigidity and that he replaced into effectively contained. the Bush administration later admitted (beforehand the invasion of Iraq) that it had no more suitable information than then, yet replaced into looking on the former information in a 'new elementary' the completed invasion, occupation and next descent into civil warfare replaced into in conserving with a planned and willfull lie. Rumsfeld replaced into instremental in construction Saddam up, turning him right into a monster and destroying the monster that he helped create. Rumsfeld has the blood of thousands of thousands on his fingers!

2016-12-10 08:50:18 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Perfect Bill that is the original pipeline deal to Israel with the Bechtel Corporation. The rest of the links are current and up to date thanks. I'm not as stupid as these Neocons. I will be voting Democrat in November too because of the lies the Republicans have told. Iraqi freedom, and mission accomplished, what a joke.

2006-07-12 18:47:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I guess you didn't know that we supported Iraq's war against Iran after the Iranian hostage crisis, huh? We paid them money and gave them weapons and we told the British to give them the biological weapons that they eventually used on their own Kurdish people.

Did you know that we trained Osama bin Laden's troops and gave him money and weapons when he was fighting the USSR in Afghanistan?

Did you know that the US bought the biological and chemical weapons research from the Japanese scientists from Unit 731 after WWII? Did you know about the horrible experiments that they did on Chinese civilians and p.o.w.s? And they were never tried for it?

Did you know we hired and helped many Nazi scientists to escape after WWII?

Read "Lies My Teacher Told Me" by James W. Loewen - it's a great expose into most of the history of American atrocities that we were never taught in school. I'm still an American patriot and believe our country is the best in the world, but I don't have blinders on to the injustices around me!

2006-07-12 18:43:51 · answer #7 · answered by Danger, Will Robinson! 7 · 0 0

I have a picture of Madeline Albright drinking champagne with Kim Jong Il.

I also have one of Al Gore shaking hands with that nutcase Fred Phelps.

2006-07-12 19:06:16 · answer #8 · answered by Mortis 3 · 0 0

probably because he was a government official, and Hussein was the head of state at the time...just business. Clinton's most frequent foreign White House guest was Yassar Arafat...word renowned terrorist....that doesn't mean Clinton loved terrorists...there is a certain level of diplomacy that is required.

2006-07-12 18:24:33 · answer #9 · answered by loubean 5 · 0 0

Well let's see. Actually he use to be an American Allie (80's), fact of the matter we trained and armed most of his government and Afghanistan too! Funny how the little things come back to bite one in the a_ _!
Shamus

2006-07-12 18:34:34 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Imagine if you spent your talented energy on something useful, like security. You could possibly prevent things like the terrorist attacks against freedom loving nations like , India, U.K., U.S.A., Canada, etc..
Did you notice if anyone of importance condemned the Mumbai attacks from China, Korea?

2006-07-12 18:40:10 · answer #11 · answered by phwar68 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers