Meaning where the teams were positioned not the rule change.
2006-07-12 17:53:00 · 9 answers · asked by dudes222 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
It actually (accurately) shows who the best teams are...
the US number 5?.. please, thank god they fixed that.
2006-07-12 17:56:16 · answer #1 · answered by Belen 3 · 7⤊ 3⤋
I think the United States should have dropped further than that.(as an American even). We didn't put forth the effort to even be considered in the top 50 or 100 nations.
The rest of the rankings are spot on.
2006-07-13 00:56:49 · answer #2 · answered by Joe Knows 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yup, for sure, realistic ?! Guinea ranked 24th, well ahead of Euro Champ Greece or rather strong soccer nations such as Norway (52 !) or Israel (51).
Im certain that Puerto Rico (190 !) deserves to be ranked 166 spots behind Guinea ?
2006-07-13 01:09:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Argentina is third (hurrah)! It's a lot more plausible than the USA at #5, that's for sure. :D The ranking looks *much* more accurate now.
2006-07-13 01:50:14 · answer #4 · answered by Flor 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The positions still dont reflect the real quality.
2006-07-13 04:17:39 · answer #5 · answered by dorian_gray 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yet, I really think it is a BIG joke.
They need to change their criteria of selection.
2006-07-13 01:02:05 · answer #6 · answered by soccer_mind 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think its more realistic than the last one
2006-07-13 01:02:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anthony4Christ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're more accurate than last time, but still wrong.
2006-07-13 03:01:32 · answer #8 · answered by Stoic 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
weird
2006-07-13 01:55:53 · answer #9 · answered by ВằĻĬ Ж 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋