http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Permcosmet_progress.jpg
2006-07-12 17:41:09 · 27 answers · asked by bebeeangeldust 4 in Beauty & Style ➔ Makeup
Good god. Yes she did, and although I sport 3 tattoos myself, I would bet the bank she will regret THAT inking desision later on.
2006-07-12 17:47:13 · answer #1 · answered by jkautt 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Before
2006-07-13 00:43:55 · answer #2 · answered by masterurownmind 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Her complexion looks better in the very first picture. But since her actual fact (cheeks, chin, etc.) weren't touched, I'm not sure that it was the permanent make-up that had an effect on her skin. If her skin clears, then I'd say that the permanent make-up actually doesn't look half back. It looks like what she probably would've applied anyways.
2006-07-13 00:48:55 · answer #3 · answered by Magdalene 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Totally before!! She looks so unnatural after! My 6 year old niece has done her makeup better than that! Why would anyone want to look like that?
2006-07-13 04:28:00 · answer #4 · answered by Mommy of 2 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The makeup looks too heavy for her features to me. Before.
2006-07-13 00:47:16 · answer #5 · answered by cricket 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A lot prettier before.
2006-07-13 00:45:36 · answer #6 · answered by wlf_a 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely before.
2006-07-13 00:46:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
before
2006-07-13 01:37:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, she looked better before the tattoos.
2006-07-13 00:45:42 · answer #9 · answered by The Apple Chick 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do- but you can see traces of eye liner in the before picture so its hard to tell how she would look.
2006-07-13 10:10:15 · answer #10 · answered by Luci 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋