Definitely; "was raised".
2006-07-12 17:36:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by sole 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
you should probably actually say "had been raised" because you said this continued to happen UNTIL yesterday, meaning the action has now stopped. (so you would use the past perfect tense)
You use "raise, raised, has raised" when you talk about physically lifting something, and "rise, rose, has risen" when the thing itself is rising (like a person rises from bed, or the sun rises in the morning.)
And, floydthefish is sadly mistaken. The perfect tense must always use the past participle form of the verb WITH has or have if it is present perfect tense, and had if it is past perfect.
2006-07-12 19:39:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by feeshbulb 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
was raised.
couldnt u say Until yesterday the flag rose everyday at 6?
Or Who stopped raising the flag?
or Where the hell is the flag?
2006-07-12 17:56:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by repo2agent 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its Raised
2006-07-12 23:25:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
(((((Linz))))) i imagine there is judgment and then there is JUDGMENT. when I remind human beings, as i'm wont to do, that they are judging human beings in direct contradiction to the gospel they declare to adhere to (Mat 7:a million, e.g.), they many times come decrease back with something like "we make judgments daily. How do we no longer?" yet you're acceptable: having evaluations,esp. even as someone's' movements threaten to harm you, or infringe on your rights, is not purely organic, that's needed. If someone says, "The Bible says to love one yet another and by no potential to judge, so, those those who're hating and judging and sneering, even although they call themselves Christians, do not look very Christian," that is an "I" truth it extremely is a extra of a truth-depending opinion about what I detect. yet even as someone says "because you do not use the same religious terminology as I do, or because you devour meat on Fridays, or because you spatter extremely of dunk, you at the instantaneous are not kept and God will deliver you to hell," that is a judgment. that is a 'you-truth' opinion it extremely is presumptuous and conceited. that's considered a spread of judgment that Jesus noted in Mat 7:a million etc. obviously you many times have the extraordinary zealot who believes that purely to disagree with him is a treacherous act of demoralizing judgment. they have a tendency to be those who've no theory that their personal evaluations ought to no longer be organic, unadulterated truth. In my journey, those have a tendency to be the "blind-faithers" and on the grounds that they're informed now to not imagine about their beliefs, they haven't any recourse to talk an straightforward opinion except to ***** that you're judging them by employing disagreeing. Sorry that's see you later. feels like i will't say something in decrease than 2500 words. No, i'm no longer lengthy-winded... I favor to imagine of it as *colloquial.* :)
2016-11-06 07:25:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"was raised"
This is past perfect tense used for something that happened continually more than once in the past.
2006-07-12 17:34:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
was raised
2006-07-12 17:49:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by wd2crv 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
was raised
2006-07-12 17:37:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by katwoman_2911 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
was raised
2006-07-12 17:33:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Hauss 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
was risen?
2006-07-12 17:33:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by got_deam_munalla 3
·
0⤊
0⤋