English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-12 16:36:31 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Music

18 answers

YUP

2006-07-12 16:39:24 · answer #1 · answered by hauspooie 2 · 0 1

Certainly, and O.J, is really looking had for the person that really did the murders.

2006-07-12 23:41:52 · answer #2 · answered by Skypilot49 5 · 0 0

He could have, but remember the glove, "if it doesn't fit, you must acquit." Something else to remember - OJ wasn't found innocent - he was found not guilty and that's a big difference. Innocent means, no way he did it. Not guilty means there's some question, but not enough of a question to find him guilty. I'd like to think he didn't do it, but the evidence pointing to his having done it is pretty damning.

2006-07-13 00:09:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, not personally but I think he knows who did. One person could not kill them both at the same time, and I doubt the second to die was waiting around for their turn.
Besides, way too many things in that case were circumstantial.

2006-07-12 23:44:57 · answer #4 · answered by Sharon N 1 · 0 0

Well he probably did many its, but I would assume you are talking about killing his wife and a jury said that he was not guilty. Some people think they have secret information.

2006-07-12 23:41:13 · answer #5 · answered by Nelson_DeVon 7 · 0 0

The question is moot. the jury decided that he didnt do it for whatever reason. You should ask "was the jury in the OJ case blind or just plain stupid?'

2006-07-12 23:43:39 · answer #6 · answered by zippo 3 · 0 0

No, but he paid someone else to do it. That's why the glove didn't fit.

Legally, if you pay someone to kill another person, you can be charged with the same crime. So yes...he "did it."

2006-07-12 23:39:58 · answer #7 · answered by Kenn 3 · 0 0

O.J. is still doing it.

2006-07-12 23:41:08 · answer #8 · answered by matzaballboy 4 · 0 0

does a bear take a readers digest out into the woods?

2006-07-12 23:41:04 · answer #9 · answered by melissa 6 · 0 0

Yes in California if you have the money, you truly can get by with murder!

2006-07-12 23:46:21 · answer #10 · answered by Retarded Dave 5 · 0 0

He didn't have the knife or gun but did have it done. And the best part was... he got away with it! A true American hero.

2006-07-12 23:41:46 · answer #11 · answered by takeashot30 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers