What is your opinion regarding the NY Times?

Answer 1

They report the news very well and are not intimidated by anyone

Answer 2

Other Than Charlie Rose, interviewer for public television, I don't know that many people who read the N.Y. Times editorial.

I have only one friend who reads the entire Sunday edition of the N.Y. Times and it takes him four days to read the whole paper.

The N.Y. Times has become like the Warren Commission's report of the President John F. Kennedy assassination. I don't know anybody who has ever read the whole 24 volumes. and yet, everybody quotes from the report as though they know about whats inside. The N.Y. Times suffers from the same type of criticism.

How many times have you ever read the N.Y. Times and is someone else telling you what's inside and how you're supposed to react to a supposed liberal newspaper.

I have read the N.Y. Times Sports edition and find many times, I disagree with what they might have to say about ball players and teams.
There are few publications that are factual or even handed and one of the closest I have found is Time magazine, for which I will be criticized for, by some who will differ.

Journalism is an art, not an exact science. Of course, there is going to be a slant. There was a slant when the Sistine Chapel was painted regarding the bible and creation. And, when the Mona Lisa was painted or when Mozart wrote his music or when a child first picks up a crayon.

O.K., so, let he who is guilty and without sin cast the first stone. And, as that famous movie actor, Al Pacino, said when he played Antonio Montana in the movie Scarface, 'you point you finger at somebody and say there goes the bad guy, what does that make you, the good guy'.

Without the N.Y.Times and the Washington Post and other large newspapers and publications to push the envelope and offer up journalistic challenges, where would the whole world of broadcast/print media be?

The worst type of journalism is the journalism that feeds off of the fears of the people for profit and spin.

'We interrupt this program to bring you this breaking news. There has been a mass escape from the nearby maximum security prison. Ten men have escaped and may be in the neighborhood. They have already burned down 15 homes, raped 20 women, killed four policemen. These men are considered armed and dangerous. Now, back to our regularly scheduled program. More at eleven'.

Can you imagine sitting down after a hard day's work, looking at the t.v. and enjoying a movie or your favorite program and suddenly being told about the escape. Followed by the immediate need to go to a McDonald's commercial advertising its new double whopper on a sessimeid seed bun. Ridiculous !

That's the type of journalism that is the worst. If it was that important to break in to a regularly scheduled t.v. program, why the need to go back to watching re-runs of the final episode of Dallas?

Why not just simply stay with the news breaking story and to hell with the donut commercial?

That's the type of journalism I hate the most. Not the slant.

Answer 3

i believe the first poster. She seems to have an truly one sided biased view. i'd anticipate it truly is a reporter is going to jot down an editorial on some thing then she must have all perspectives. There are much better subject matters to bypass alongside with a cesarean area than organic baby start, for mom and toddler. and that i in my view imagine that if you're having a c-area purely to circumvent the soreness then you definately are a lot less of a females. in case you could't stand the soreness of exertions then you definately don't have toddlers. and that i do say that with have had 3 births and three epidurals. absolutely everyone who elects to have significant surgical operation purely to circumvent soreness is an fool. The soreness from the surgical operation is a procedures better extreme than the soreness from pushing a toddler out of your vagina. And it is lasts longer. This females needs a reality examine.

Answer 4

As a former newspaper editor/publisher, I am ashamed of the NY Times. They do not care who they hurt, just so they can sell papers. And, the main revenue doesn't come from subscriptions or rack sales...the main revenue comes from advertising. If all the advertisers would transfer their business to the NY Sun, perhaps the NY Times would reconsider their selfishness.

Answer 5

The Times is just doing its job, trying to report the truth. It has been "swift boated" by the Bush Administration because this has been the most secretive presidency we have ever had and they sure don't like it when someone looks over their shoulder. We know why the Times reports, we don't know why the Administration is so secretive, especially in areas which have nothing to do with the war.

Answer 6

It's liberal opinion on reporting/ biasing the news it reports and is a detriment to this country's security in our fighting the wars in the middle east. They were the one's who reported that maybe the CIA was tracing Bin Ladins" phone calls to zero in on him like our police depts do .They reported that at GITMO terrorists were bing treated inhumanely by our soldiers by humiliating them with dog leashes on and being naked (very silimar to a college fraturnity hazing ) and nothing about our boys being beheaded. During WW11 this was considered treasoness to leak troop movements but now they delight in critisizing and degrading our efforts in removing the threats to our country by degrading our efforts in the middle east. . It's as if they have completely forgot 9-11. Personally I think the people of New York city should run the whole staff out of NYC on a rail and then tar and feather them

Answer 7

It is a liberal view of the news. Press should be impartial; The New York Times doesn't know what that means. I don't even spend money on that junk. The Inquirer has more points with me. LOL

Answer 8

It's the best tool the terrorist have. If they need info. all they got to do is read the NY Times.

Answer 9

I like reading the World Weekly News better and it's more accurate.

Answer 10

A beacon of freedom.