2006-07-12 14:53:21 · 6 answers · asked by radiant_star888 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
depends on what war you a speaking of and what nation, a general answer would be no. but certain nations NOW follow the geneva convention which is a set of rules or laws of warfare. so again depending on what nation, what war, and HOW the rebel killed the autocratic person then the general answer would be no.
2006-07-12 14:57:16 · answer #1 · answered by thirteen_fox 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
any crime committed at any point would b considered a crime, in this case, murder. Afterall, if it wasn't considered a crime then by golly everyone would be shooting each other, without having to go through the consequences. Don't believe what other ppl tell u, trust me, that person very well committed a crime, since its wrong to kill ppl no matter what!! NO ONE DESERVES TO DIE!!
2006-07-12 22:05:28 · answer #2 · answered by Lovemylifefriendsfamily 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends who wins the war. As a general proposition, only members of the losing side commit war crimes. Just one of those things.
2006-07-12 21:58:34 · answer #3 · answered by iansand 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As for as I'm concerned it's never a crime,up with the people,down with the PIG.
2006-07-12 21:59:00 · answer #4 · answered by gobobgo55 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
History is written by the victors.
2006-07-12 21:57:30 · answer #5 · answered by chupakabra123 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the insurgents target occupiers and collaborators. if they kill the wrong ones they can call it collateral damage just like we do, and like israel does.
2006-07-12 21:55:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋