No, factual answers are the key. If you notice, liberals tend to use more facts to back up an argument; whereas, republicans revert to name calling a lot quicker.
EDIT ADDED: Just look at some of the answers and you'll see my point. My answer started with my description and reasons why I felt a liberal would win. Their arguments immediately attack the liberal without stating what they would do to win.
2006-07-12 14:38:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
4⤊
4⤋
I am glad that You asked this. If the Patriots went against those who Only complain, Always complain, with no idea of a precise plan of action, other than the one enacted........
Man, Liberal bits, like everywhere, everywhere........
It would be like putting a plastic knife, up against an AK-47
Because that is all Liberals have, is talk. However sad, talking doesn't work with unreasonable People. If Our President was like that, We would all be dead, or worse. There has always been War. Does that mean People like it, no? But We must have a strong Leader in Office. We can't even agree among Ourselves, how are We going to Make Peace with People from different Cultures?
2006-07-12 21:37:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The liberals can never win in the long term because lies can not and do not stand up to reality They may look good but whoever heard of an unattractive con man/woman ? The liberal religion is looking for you to believe their words. Fool me once shame on you fool me twice and shame on me. Every country that has followed liberal doctrine has suffered economic failure why should we follow them? The state of Maine has a very liberal legislature and is only one of two states that suffered economic slow down in 2005 The other state suffered two major hurricanes.
2006-07-12 21:53:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I myself prefer a combination of fact and wit. When possible, I like to entertain as I educate.
If they seem to be winning, it's due only to sheer numbers. In the battle of ideas, quantity of troops is important, but not as much as quality of information and ideas. Intellectual honesty and credibility is important as well, meaning that you have to be willing to admit that some on your own side are full of crap too. (Got that, Neddie?) If you don't have that, you will soon be exposed as just another shill, sheep, lemming, Kool-Aid drinker, whatever you wanna call it, and your opinion becomes irrelevant. I think most, or at least many, people here are smart enough to figure out who is who in that regard.
2006-07-12 21:55:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chris S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is what you call winning?
The Liberal Agenda
•attack American traditions, specifically Christian traditions and the traditional American family
•engage in "get-even" policies that support discrimination when it benefits historically disadvantaged groups
•punish and/or discourage achievement through taxation and fiscal policies
•use the rulings of the Judicial branch of the government as de facto law, irrevocable by anything short of Constitutional amendment or a future court ruling, thus bypassing the legislative process. Roe V. Wade is the most frequently cited example of "judicial activism". (48 million dead and counting)
•weaken the military strength and morale of the country by vilifying the practice of armed combat and hesitating to use force when it appears necessary
•use regulatory bodies over private enterprise to accomplish social goals and restrict competition (government, education, labor)
•establish secular and progressive social policy, including support for gay marriage, abortion, liberal drug policy, euthanasia and prostitution legalization.
•implement a foreign policy supporting the protection of human rights and multiculturalism through activism, social intervention and violence (social anarchism).
2006-07-12 21:36:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Libs, having no morals, are quicker to attack viciously and pull no punches. Most of the questions asked by libs to cons are very accusatory in nature, for example: "Why do repubes/cons hate everyone?"
To John J
Neo-Socialists, I like that! Good call.
2006-07-12 21:31:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by 1,1,2,3,3,4, 5,5,6,6,6, 8,8,8,10 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. This is disinformation planted by conservatives as part of the psychological warfare doctrine. It gives the appearance that neo-socialists (I refuse to call them liberals as that is not what they are) are winning until it is time to unleash the beast. Cry havoc and let loose the dogs of war! Sorry...got carried away there.
2006-07-12 21:29:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by johngjordan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only thing Liberals are winning is who in the US are the biggest dumbasses. They couldn't win in a battlefield because they don't believe in war and wanna dismantle our military so what would they fight us with? They're a joke and they won't get far with their idiotic policies.
2006-07-12 21:29:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ryan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
So Iraq is a "Win"? Obviously no wit was available for the decision to get into that mess.
2006-07-12 21:45:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by ontarioborn 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ha, bad grammar kills another futile Liberal argument again.
Please note that you stated the Libs "were" winning. This implies that they are now losing.
2006-07-12 21:31:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by chris 4
·
0⤊
0⤋