English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-12 14:01:07 · 21 answers · asked by 5375 4 in Politics & Government Politics

21 answers

hahahahaha.

Bleh, that was me actually physically laughing after I read your answer.

Holy ******* $**** if you really think that the UN is the best the world has got going!!!!

Which one of these great UN efforts do you applaud:
Doing nothing in Rawanda
Doing nothing in Somalia
Doing nothing in Sudan
Doing nothing but waste paper with useless resolutions for constant violations by Iraq over 12 years.
Doing nothing but waste paper with useless resolutions for nuclear violations by Iran
Canceling the resolution meeting to sanction N. Korea this week
Doing nothing against the killings by China
Oil for Food scandal that made millions for UN executives while Iraqis starved and died
Doing nothing in Serbia, requiring Clinton to launch an ILLEGAL war

I would say that NATO has been infinitely more beneficial than that dog $**** pool in the UN

2006-07-12 14:18:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The US does not play well with others. It likes to think that it is exceptional. American Exceptionalism, it is termed in the rest of the world. But then, that's just the rest of the world talking, and we don't feel the rest of the world amounts to much, do we? I mean, these people have different opinions and different ideas from us and disagree a lot with us, so why should we pay any attention to such a bunch? I mean, really, they go around acting like we're not better than they are, the nerve. So maybe the US should just pick up its marbles and go home.

2006-07-12 14:14:21 · answer #2 · answered by sonyack 6 · 0 0

in case you haven't got an opinion, write down the benefits and drawbacks of the UN, and then choose for your self. in case you nevertheless haven't got an opinion, outline your perspectives contained in the accurate. advantages: -Negotiations can avert conflict -Sanctions ought to correctly be positioned on international locations breaking global regulation ( Many sanctions were positioned on Iran in worry that that is construction a nuclear weapon) -Brings international locations at the same time to strive against global themes consisting of 'global warming'. -international locations can be sure issues at the same time -makes use of little funds even as thinking that is a global company protecting purely about each and every us of a contained in the international. -Takes no sovereignty from the international locations in contact. disadvantages : -It can not stress international locations to barter ( Israeli-Palestinian conflict) -that is being usurped by employing businesses consisting of the ecu, NAU, ASEAN and the AU. ( ecu Union, North American Union, association of South East Asian international locations and the African Union). -It does no longer have a definitive function -in a lot of situations that is unable to do adequate to punish certain international locations disadvantages

2016-11-06 07:12:35 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

UNITED NATION SIS THE WORTHLESS PIECE OF ****! THEY HAVE NO FIGHTING SPIRIT AND WHEN THE **** HITS THE FAN YOU CAN KISS THERE *** GOOD BYE!!!
1 marine divison= the whole british army
1 U.S. army range divison= 3/4 the britsh army
1 U.S. army regular divsion= 1/2 the British army
1 U.S. army reserve divsion = 1/4
( all this HAS i repeat HAs been proven if you disagree move to britian and go say champ or something)

2006-07-12 14:18:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"It's another 'League of Nations'!"

--elderly Jewish man in Richmond, Virginia, speaking in 2004, who was a 19-year-old soldier capturing German officers in Nuremberg in early 1945

The UN has become a whorehouse of spies and dictators who posture and look authoritative by speaking to "the world" from the dias. Worse than nothing. Real peace will come forth from the G7 and NATO (unless the USA "cracks" NATO to pieces with its torture policy, which is what is slowly happening).

2006-07-12 14:07:53 · answer #5 · answered by urbancoyote 7 · 0 0

What is wrong with all you f***ing yanks? The UN is the best the world has got and without it millions more people would be dying each year through war, poverty and hunger. Just because it gets in the way of your president and his wars doesn't automatically mean it 'sux' or that it is 'useless'.

How many of you know anything whatsoever about what the UN really is or what it does? I suggest you all switch off Fox News and try finding out for yourself about the good work the UN does.

2006-07-12 14:05:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

useless, corrupt, arrogant, obloivious and ungrateful.

listen, "bleh" when you contribute the amount of cash that we do, then you can b i t c h about what the UN does (or doesn't do). all we know is that it's corrupt (oil for food scandal, anyone?), ineffective (why didn't they act on their resolutions against iraq before the second gulf war?) and oblivious to reality. why haven't they stepped in to stop the genocides in africa? what have they done about iran and north korea trying to acquire nukes? what are they doing against international( do you remember 7/7 last year, mate?) terrorism and why oh why have they admitted countries like china (and others with atrocious human rights records) into the UN comission on human rights? get your facts in order before you spout off against america you crumpet-eating chump!

2006-07-12 14:06:55 · answer #7 · answered by zoo2626 4 · 0 0

Hey Bleh
I pictured people standing over their toilets going Bleh, bleh, bleh, at just the mention of the United Nations.What slimey thuggery do you admire about this organization? It hates America. Screws America, whenever possible. Remember the billions we were screwed out of?

2006-07-12 14:57:05 · answer #8 · answered by zzz 2 · 0 0

Corrupt. Hey "bleh", I guess "Oil for Food" is a good example of how good a job the UN does. Or maybe the "Sex for Food" scandals work better for ya. Wanker.

2006-07-12 14:22:52 · answer #9 · answered by johngjordan 3 · 0 0

It has become a waste of effort. No one cares about anything but their personal agendas. The security council has become incapable of making decisions.

I say we move it to Paris or somewhere and stop supporting it.

2006-07-12 14:11:54 · answer #10 · answered by Karl the Webmaster 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers