How can MLB be considered "fair" without salary caps?

Question

This is a follow-up to my last question. (Thanks for the great answers, I definitely learned something! But now I have even more questions, lol!)

The Indians aren't playing tonight, can you tell?

Answer 1

That's what makes baseball so wonderful. Big names and big paychecks don't translate into wins. If you break down the total team salaries of every MLB team and compare that to their W-L records, you will see through proper statistical analysis that there is no significant relationship between salary and wins. Look at the defending World Series champs. The White Sox are not a "big market" team.

Answer 2

Why put salary caps on the teams, the Yankees (highest payroll in the league) spend 198,662,180 a year on players while Florida (the lowest salary) 14,344,500 however the Marlins won the World Series, the Cubs(7th highest out of 30 teams) 94,841,166 and look at the season they are having.

just a revision:
Luxury Tax in Major League Baseball
Major League Baseball has instead implemented the so-called luxury tax, an arrangement by which teams whose aggregate payroll exceeds a certain figure (annually revised) must pay into a pool designed to help the less affluent teams pay higher salaries. However, critics point out that the luxury tax has had little effect on maintaining competitive balance and on overspending by affluent teams. For the 2004 season, only the New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox and Anaheim Angels paid any luxury tax; such teams had superstar players whose yearly salary was close to the entire payroll of weaker clubs. Due to opposition of a powerful MLB union and because the Yankees and Red Sox refused to side with the majority of MLB owners, the implementation of a salary cap is unlikely at the moment.

Unlike the NFL and NBA, MLB has no team salary floor. The only minimum limits for team payrolls are based on the minimum salaries for players of various levels of experience written into MLB's collective bargaining agreement

Answer 3

It is not fair and will never be fair and the reason is the players union feels a salary cap will limit the amount the top stars can get. The truth is the only way baseball will ever have a salary cap is if the players union strikes due to the owners growing a backbone and demanding a salary cap or the owners lock them out during contract talks like what happened in hockey. Baseball will never have a salary cap in my personal opinion because th players union is just too strong.

Answer 4

i do not see the MLB or the gamers association ever authorizing a earnings cap, ought to it help similar communities, perchance, yet maximum communities which have small salaries have them because their proprietors ought to particularly line their already fat wallet with extra money. people continually make the Yankees and red Sox out to be the large undesirable bullies in the MLB and could purchase any participant they prefer, that's thoroughly faulty. George Steinbrennier himself once suggested that the Yankees followers are keen to pay for the tickets so he owes it to them to spend that money on the crew. i'm particular the red Sox proprietors have an same perception, the followers pay to work out the most acceptable achieveable crew on the container, if extra proprietors the position keen to spend then there should be a lot a lot less communicate about a earnings cap or a league minimum.

Answer 5

There is a cap so to speak because Steinbrenner had to pay a major fine for going way over it.2 years ago and I am sure before that and since.A-Fraud was a big reason for it and not worth it.It does go to show you that it isn't the amount you spend but how you spend it and other teams have a lot better players right now.I love my YANKEES but do not agree with the way Steinbrenner runs his show.

Answer 6

MLB does have salary caps
That cap was I think 102 mill last year.
The mets, red sox, and yankees all paid luxury tax because of that.

Answer 7

Are there salary caps in the technology industry? No. You compete with what you have.

Answer 8

'D is for Derby' will have kids racing to read about horses

It was over in a blink.You turned around, turned back, and it was done. Finished. You missed the best part, so keep your eyes peeled when you watch the horse races this spring. Wilbur and illustrated by Jaime Corum.Just two minutes.That's about how long it takes for the Kentucky Derby, from opening gate to finish. You probably can't think of a quicker sport, because there probably isn't one. And in this book, the very first letter of the alphabet stands for the very first Kentucky Derby winner, Aristides,


http://www.topcapshome.com

Answer 9

its not