did ''smith sisters murdered anonymously'' really happend?

Answer 1

It is all FAKE. Here is why.

The younger sister is murdered while the older girl is either sleeping beside or going to the window to check on an odd sound, yet the older sibling hears nothing happening in the room and is alerted to something's being amiss only because the bed is wet and ill-smelling upon her return to it.

Rather than scream for help or run from the room, the older girl hides in the closet.

The older sister is pulled from the closet by her murderer and her body is returned there to be hung for her parents to discover, yet while she's in this closed space before her killer takes her from it, she carves hers and her sister's names and the time and date. If she had something with which to gouge messages into the floorboards or onto the walls, why didn't she use it to stab at her attacker and escape his clutches? Also, wasn't it thoughtful of her murderer to afford her time to finish her woodworking escapades before coming for her?

The parents (who we presume are sleeping in the same house, since the story doesn't mention their being absent that night) hear nothing of their two daughters being murdered.

The son (who we work out from the story is 12 years old: "15 years ago" less "2 years after the the sisters deaths" less a nine-month gestation period) lives those twelve years in the murder room yet never once notices the message carved in the closet.

The girls were murdered "In 1993" yet the IM'ing ghost of one of them informs her brother she died "15 years ago." Our calendar says it's 2005, not 2008.

Instant message capability didn't become an online reality until 1997 when AOL introduced its Instant Messenger service. Yahoo Messenger (which the narrative tells us was used by the murderer to contact one of the sisters prior to his killing her) began in 1999. However, while IM didn't exist in 1993, chat rooms did — IRC (Internet Relay Chat) was most certainly part of the cyber world at least as far back as 1993, else I retain rather vivid yet baseless false memories of what I was doing with a great many of my nights back then.

Answer 2

Dear Jaffandhra should better be cautious when placing questions here that the sentence is composed properly so that other persons do not make out a different sense of the question. Common peoples are fond of not hearing properly, not reading properly, not thinking over the matter and also fond of extracting otherwise meaning against what is intended to tell. This is life. Have the example of the question posted here. By ‘Im sleeping with my sister from childhood’; dear wanted to mean dear is used to sleep by sharing the same bed with sister since childhood. That has been misappropriated by other answerers that dear is having sexual intercourse with sister since childhood, just by making a slang meaning of the word ‘sleeping with’. So, dear should be careful of using words and sentences. Now, venture for the query. May be that the dwelling house was so short of rooms or space that parents had to allow sharing of bed in childhood. Or, may be they found that the girl child is getting scared of sleeping alone. In some of poorer country or society; due to insufficient space in the dwellings, children are often allowed to share the same bed until they attain puberty when beds are made separate. Now, she is matured, both should have separate bed. Sister is matured, brother also got matured. Natural sexual inquisitiveness may get to physical attraction on both sides, which will have a forbidden incest. Moreover, such attraction gains to mental affliction which in terms of psychology is told as ‘attachment’. After attaining sufficiently grown up age, both would have their own family life through marriage, but such ‘attachment’ would not let any of the two to adjust with their family. Lately, psychopathy may be the outcome. So, the separate bedding is made for grown up brothers and sisters – preferably in separate rooms. This all in nutshell. Thanks.

Answer 3

This Site Might Help You.

RE:
did ''smith sisters murdered anonymously'' really happend?

Answer 4

No, It's just a sutpid chain that people put up on myspace becasue they were bored. They might have originated off some other murder and screwed with the facts a bit so it sounded creepier. But I doubt it honestly happened

Answer 5

Now, I myself could believe the murder story but not the chain itself. It is bad with math and I really think people need to stop with them. If the murders ever did happen then people need to respect the family and the dead members instead of making up some immature and moronic story. But the murder, that is a heart thumper. The chain letter, yea... right. Bogus. The whole thing, murder included... a story. A story not even worth a believer.

Answer 6

100% fake

Answer 7

Claim: Ghosts of two murdered teen girls return to kill and skin parents who failed to tell their subsequent son of the girls' existence.

Status: False.
Plainfield,
Wisconsin, is a community of less than a thousand people located in central Wisconsin. As its one claim to fame, it was the birthplace of Ed Gein, a farmer who was convicted of murdering one woman in 1957 and confessed to having killed another in 1954. His notoriety came, however, from his use of dead bodies: he mutilated the corpses of women, cutting off a variety of their body parts and fashioning these into macabre items.

As one might suspect, murder in Plainfield is relatively rare. As one might further suspect, no two teen girls named Lisa and Sarah Smith were murdered in that town in 1993, nor their parents a number of years later. The story is fiction, plain and simple, just another example of the 'bad things will happen to you if you don't forward this chain letter' genre. (The concept is stated explicitly in its text: "this is a death chain. if you dont send this in the next hour the parents will kill you at night.") We discuss another example of this type of chain letter — one that uses a photo to tell its chilling tale — in our "Bed Reckoning" article.

Answer 8

course not, they said it happened in 1993 when yahoo messenger was created in 1999 or close by then.

Answer 9

no this cant be true because if the sisters "died" in 1993 how is she gonna say on the computer to the little boy (A.K.A her little brother) "i was killed 15 years ago" ummmm DUHHH its 2006 not 2008 think about it.

Answer 10

No its just a stupid chain letter or in this case they call it a "death chain" and its so frickin stupid!

Answer 11

its not true...i found a website proving it. if you read what it has to say, you feel kind of stupid for believing it.