English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

do people still not teach their children that calling someone names only makes them a bully?

who would want their child to grow up calling those they don't like, or disagree with, silly names?

2006-07-12 11:46:37 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

23 answers

Of course using vulgar names is a sign of low intelligence. But considering the power George Bush has over each American citizen's life, I think that his actions are rightfully scrutinized and criticized.

The worst result of a name caller's actions is that someone might be offended, the worst result of Bush's actions is that people have died.

2006-07-12 11:52:48 · answer #1 · answered by eyad d 2 · 1 1

Thank you. I am a Democrat. I disagree with several things that President (note the respect) Bush has done and says should be done. I do NOT call him names. When people attacked President Clinton that way, I also spoke up. I didn't speak up against the Republicans, or against the Democrats. I spoke up against sedition and undermining our country and elected officials.

They should know. They do. They don't care. They have free speech, but so do we. Answer them, every time. Take political affiliation out of it.

2006-07-12 12:10:10 · answer #2 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 0 0

Well Neddie, is this a public conversion on your part?

Just to keep you and your admirers up to speed on your aversion to "name calling" I went back just one week into your questions and found these terms which you've used for those you oppose:

Rubber stamp dick
Black Rice oil tanker
Criminal
Lie, cheat and steal
Cruel
Vile
Creepy
Laura shoved the pretzel down George’s throat
Brain-washed
Plagiarizer
Anti-Christ
Kinky
Hooker
Ashamed of their (gay) daughter
Godless Wielding Christians where most of our nations child molesters live

The granddaddy of them all was a question of yours which first caught my attention 2 weeks ago:

"Why do you think the ANN-T-CHRIST is defending her lover the RUSH-GOP-NAZI-a... his recent drug possession?
Since (the Antichrist godless) Coulter benefited from LIMBAUGH'S illegal possession of a doctor prescribed prescription for VIAGRA, don't you think she should recuse thyself?
Why are these self proclaimed CHRISTIANS running around lying about, voter fraud and possessing prescription drugs in someone else's name?
Is this behaviour accepted by the Christian Community?"

Neddie, these are YOUR words. I'm sorry to keep using what I think is an appropriate "name" for you. But it's unavoidable:

Until you apologize and accknowledge your past, you are a Hypocrite.

2006-07-12 15:31:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

attempt nominating someone who can actual beat someone so inept next time. If one of those meant imbecile can beat the meant ideal the Democrats ought to muster, what does that say about the Democrats? Oh, and no, he wasn't AWOL. The nationwide preserve has a distinct way of doing issues. He made up the ignored assignments to the pride of his commanding officials and became granted an honorable discharge. it is the base line no matter if you wish it or no longer.

2016-12-01 04:09:51 · answer #4 · answered by mizer 3 · 0 0

The man seems to like to call others names

John Kerry: Flip Flopper
Karl Rove: Turd Blossom(no joke, he really called him that)
Most Democrats:CUT AND RUN!! CUT AND RUN!!

If I had more time I could write a book on this

2006-07-12 11:51:50 · answer #5 · answered by FootballFan1012 6 · 0 0

Ya know, Neddie, I never thought I'd see the day, but I actually agree with you for once. Calling names does not advance constructive debate; it merely suggests that you're out of ammo, so to speak.

2006-07-12 12:03:28 · answer #6 · answered by Chris S 5 · 0 0

Is calling Bush, G.Dumbya the same as blaming it all on Bill Clinton?

2006-07-12 16:09:55 · answer #7 · answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6 · 0 0

I disagree...there's lots of intelligent people out there seething with an irrational and inexplicable hatred of the man.

2006-07-12 11:51:37 · answer #8 · answered by 4999_Basque 6 · 0 0

So, if that is true...what you say in your supporting details, then why did you specify GW. Why did not just not say politician? I bet I know. Cause your one of those hypocrites that don't want your guys made fun of but have no problem bashing the others.

2006-07-12 11:51:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well... some people get mad... but it's not called for...

to play off an old Dennis Miller joke.... there are plenty of rational, policy driven, issue related reasons to dislike Bush, there is no real need for name calling...

2006-07-12 11:57:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers