Sorry for not including a liberal but I couldn't think of any off-hand.
Yes they keep us informed somewhat and point out political hypocrisy, but they are also guilty of it themselves as often.
Instead of trying to reach an understanding with others of opposing viewpoints they make up exaggerated strawman "liberals" and "conservatives" to lambast which people seem to believe as real.
2006-07-12 11:19:42 · 13 answers · asked by anonacoup 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I don't think they're good for America, but "free speech" and all that. . .the worst part are the people who take their word for everything. If people want to listen to them to get a good laugh or reaffirm their own beliefs, I could care less. Just look at it as entertainment and not fact. A lot of they say can be disproved, shown to be a portion of truth or shown to have been spun, etc. We all need a little rant every now and then (I have Al Franken and Michael Moore for mine), but when it's over...read a REAL UNBIASED news article.
2006-07-12 11:30:21 · answer #1 · answered by Carlito Sway 5 · 6⤊ 3⤋
i imagine of them because the Unholy 3. truthfully, the vitriol and bile they spew out on a usual foundation is heavily worrying, a minimum of even as that's not relaxing - often times that's both straight away. Ann Coulter particularly is so caustic and finished of hate that she would not look human most of the time. She is the mythical Harpy, personified.
2016-11-01 22:53:19 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only in America do we need people to hate because of their opinions. I dont agree with any of the mentioned people but they do have a purpose. They do help keep political debate alive and from time to time something comes out of their mouthes that makes sense. Noone is right or wrong all of the time.
2006-07-12 11:33:59 · answer #3 · answered by diaryofamadblackman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mao used all the politically diverse people as fertilizer. They ground up 52 million people and spread them on the fields. It was good for China (look at them now) So a few Fox News anchors ground up and spread around might help America.
2006-07-12 11:29:17 · answer #4 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
don't mind coulter or rush but i despise o'reilly. all that bullsh*it about his no-spin zone is pure crap. none of them actually report news they instigate news and stir it up just to attract viewers. sean hannity is probably the worst of them all. he'll speak about a subject and deride the person who opposes his viewpoints for like 10 minutes, then gives the other person like 1 minute for a rebuttal. all of them are hypocrites and make america a lesser place in my opinion.all for the allmighty dollar too. i'm sure off camera they are totally different people.
2006-07-12 11:24:58 · answer #5 · answered by YOU WILL BOW TO ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're as good for America as the likes of Al Franken and Michael Moore. Just like any other source, you have to sift through what they say and figure out for yourself what's true.
2006-07-12 11:26:50 · answer #6 · answered by Chris S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
do you think that the fact that on the front page of the Democratic National Commity's web site there are links to "John Macain's failings" and "Allen somebody's hipocracy" while not siting ANY achievements by the party bodes well for the Democratic Party?
2006-07-12 11:22:25 · answer #7 · answered by ben s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are self-serving hypocrits that spew hate and instruct the conservative robots on what to think.
2006-07-12 11:24:47 · answer #8 · answered by DT 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uninformed apologists who contribute to global warming with all their hot air!
2006-07-12 11:23:09 · answer #9 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, they make the rest of us look smarter.
2006-07-12 11:24:14 · answer #10 · answered by sassyk 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋