1/2
the events are independent
2006-07-12 10:34:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think some people are reading too much into this question. Somebody mentioned that the two incidents are mutually exclusive, and that person is correct. Desolator814 said that the chances were 1 in 4 but this would only be correct if the question had said "A person has 2 children, what are the chances of both of them being a boy"? Since we know that one of them is a boy this reduces the chances to 1 in 2 or 50/50.
Bob-G said that the chances are 1 in 3, but again, it doesn't matter in what order the children are born, the chances are still 50/50.
2006-07-12 11:36:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by brainyandy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a 50/50 chance that that person has 2 sons
2006-07-12 11:08:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1/2
2006-07-12 10:36:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by None 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
1/3
If the family has 2 children, the possible combinations are:
Older son, younger son
Older son, younger daughter
Older daughter, younger son
Older daughter, younger daughter.
The fact that you know one of the kids is a son eliminates the last one. Of the three remaining, only the first one has the other kid being a son.
Now, if they told you their oldest kid was a son, you'd eliminate the last two options. Of the remaining two options, one would have the other kid being a son, giving you a chance of 1/2.
If, instead, they told you they had a daughter, the first option would be eliminated. Two of the remaining options would include a son, giving you a chance of 2/3 that the other kid is a son.
The amount of info you actually have determines the chances of you guessing the sex of the remaining kid.
2006-07-12 10:51:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bob G 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1/4 since the probability of having two sons is 1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4
where each 1/2 is for one son.
2006-07-12 10:36:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the odds are less than 50% due to the fact that if it was another son they would have said they have 2 boys
2006-07-12 10:44:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by rob 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
50/50
2006-07-12 10:35:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by donna 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well if the other is a son they wouldn't have worded it in that way... they would have said "one is a son" instead of "One, a son".
2006-07-12 10:40:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by dellamonster 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
50%, assuming they are natural born. If the children were adopted, it would depend on the personality of the one adopting.
2006-07-12 10:37:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tim 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with rob. They would have said 2 sons.so I would say the chances are zero.
2006-07-12 10:51:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by auntienanny230 3
·
0⤊
0⤋