2006-07-12 10:28:26 · 19 answers · asked by American Superman 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They blame Bush for every problem in this world. Apparently the world was perfect when Clinton was president because we never heard these complaints.
2006-07-12 10:31:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You must be a NEOCON. I bet you're a chickenhawk, too. You blew it on this one, though. Apparently no blames Bush for terrorism in India. He's done enough stupid stuff here. He can't be blamed though, Cheney is the one who really makes the decisions.
2006-07-12 17:45:44 · answer #2 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I blame Bush for most things, but probably not that. Terrorists could care less who they attack. They are evil and want nothing more than to see people suffer. Now, if they could find a way to take Bush out, along with his daddy and brother, I say...No, that would be liberal of me wouldn't it?
2006-07-12 17:30:52 · answer #3 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course they do, the liberals will blame Bush for anything they can think of.
2006-07-12 17:31:03 · answer #4 · answered by Smitty 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think India should attack Norway in retaliation for the bombings!
Because Norway has as much to do with the bombings in India as Iraq did with 9/11. Nothing!
2006-07-12 17:50:26 · answer #5 · answered by DT 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I blame terrorists.
I do, however, blame Bush for the death of all of our troops who have died in Iraq. We don't belong over there. It is not our country's job to regulate the governments of other countries, regardless of whether they have terrorists or not.
I partially blame Bush for the decline of our economy and the 170 billion dollar deficit we are in the middle of.
2006-07-12 17:36:31 · answer #6 · answered by birdistasty 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I blame the British for their shoddy division of old British India which put Kashmir mostly in India.
2006-07-12 17:33:40 · answer #7 · answered by bradcymru 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, I blame the terrorists for the terrorism in India
2006-07-12 17:32:01 · answer #8 · answered by mom1025 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd regard myself as liberal, though not "Liberal-with-a-capital-L-you're-the-child-of-the-devil" Bush (for once) isn't to blame, it's the relationship between India and Pakistan, and the fact that they can't decide who should run Kashmir.
2006-07-12 17:31:57 · answer #9 · answered by Mordent 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would we blame GWB?? Do you know something we don't know??They believe the person in charge of this atrocity was a man named Ibrahim an Indian drug lord with ties to AlQaida. Osama to be exact. They surmise that he and Osama use the same routes to go in and out of Afghanistan and Pakistan's Mountain areas.He was responsible for the one in 95 I think. However if we had gone after Osama the way we should have( and still should be doing) maybe we also would have stopped him Ibrahim. So maybe he is indirectly responsible. Thank you for bringing that to my attention!!!
2006-07-12 17:47:25 · answer #10 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋