Personaly I like The Beatles much better
2006-07-12 10:05:10 · 23 answers · asked by 60's Punk 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Yeah, I agree the Beatles were better. Not to say Zeppelin was bad -- but the Beatles did a wider variety of music and were in the spotlight a lot longer. They have kick a$$ music in addition to ballads that demonstrates true music magic.
2006-07-12 10:08:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Beatles changed the face of music, Led Zeppelin produced great songs. There is the difference. The Beatles made a huge impact on the world, and music, and Led Zeppelin was just really good. Not to mention The Beatles went through a pop phase, a rock phase, a psychadelic phase, and a jam phase which all had perfect music. My final reason that The Beatles are much better than Led is the fact that EACH AND EVERY Beatles song sounds different. Not one of their songs sounds alike. Led Zeppelin, with only Robert Plant singing, sound very similar in every song, though they are great. I love both, but THE BEATLES are the best band ever.
2006-07-12 10:12:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's got to be the Beatles. Their music will live forever. I met Jimmy Page, later of Led Zeppelin, in the 60's and even he was a Beatles fan and thought they were the greatest. He particularly admired George Harrison's guitar playing.
2006-07-13 08:54:25 · answer #3 · answered by quatt47 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Led Zeppelin is my widespread, oftentimes because i'm also a blues fan. Cream is likewise a fave --- I surely haven't any difficulty with the Beatles or the Who, yet they were given a lot radio time in my teens that I kinda were given burned out on them. doubtless, Robert Plant became the superb singer, Lennon-McCartney the most prolific composers, and Eric Clapton the most dedicated to furthering song with the creation and promoting of lesser accepted great artists (ie. Marley and J.J.Cale). I also am keen on Harrison's paintings. surprising drummer should be Michael Giles from King red (courtroom of the red King), notwithstanding. this is puzzling to say "surprising." "Day in the existence" on Sgt. Peppers is literature. All of Led Zeppelin a million is literature. And the Cream's "memories of courageous Ulysses" is definitely literature. fantastically with the quantity cranked up on a respectable classification a skill amp. there is in simple terms too a lot solid stuff on your question. Have a blast!
2016-10-14 09:55:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd take the top 3 Beatles albums over any 3 Zeppelin albums, but I'd take the Zeppelin collection over the Beatles collection.
2006-07-12 10:09:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Beatles. Doh
2006-07-12 10:08:27 · answer #6 · answered by thunder_valkyrie 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are both amazing! How can you compare them! I love them both so much. But I guess if I had to pick I would acutalyl lean toward Led Zeppelin just because I like the style a little more.
2006-07-12 10:09:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Beatles,hands down.I like Led Zepplin,but the Beatles are better because they were much more upbeat and slightly sarcastic most of the time.
2006-07-12 10:08:32 · answer #8 · answered by kimberli 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Apples and oranges dude. I mean the Beatles were really neato, but your talking about two completely different sound here. It's like comparing say "Cream" with "pink Floyd" two completely different things. But if I had to pick one of the two to listen for the rest of my days it would definitely be Zeppelin.
2006-07-12 10:23:21 · answer #9 · answered by Tom M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hard to compare exactly, different eras, different styles. Liked the Beatles better though.
2006-07-12 10:09:53 · answer #10 · answered by aboukir200 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋