Modern physicists in general agress that the black hole is centered around a singularity, which is a point of infinite mass. In the singularity, all physical laws break down.
So basically, we can describe it but cannot visualize what it is.
2006-07-12 09:43:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by galactic_man_of_leisure 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
I think black holes do not exist, and einstein got it wrong. Miller's work clearly invalidated special relativity by achieving a positive result indicating an entrained ether through which light propagates.
Aside from which fact the electromagnetic forces of attraction and repulsion act over far far larger distances and on much larger scales than gravity, so the idea that gravity could ever muster enough strength to overcome electromagnetic attraction or repulsion is just ridiculous. Astrophysiscists don't get plasma physics training thus they misunderstand the nature of the universe and postulate stupid ideas like black holes and "dark energy" and "dark matter."
Seriously, do a little research/reading:
http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm
http://www.thunderbolts.info
http://www.plasmacosmology.net
http://www.anpheon.org
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/plasma+cosmology
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/electric+universe+concept
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/birkeland+currents
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/alfven
Check it out and get back to me. You might be surprised. I think that stars are basically just giant atoms with a massive nucleus, and a huge electron shell caught up in an electromagnetic field. Since the force of electromagnatism is so much greater than the force of gravity, it is unlikely that a "blackhole" could ever overcome those forces to be created in the first place.
It is of course the electromagnetic force that keeps us from falling through the floor when jump off a table. Gravity seems strong but only because we don't see or properly understand the much stronger force that keeps it in balance.
Physicists should open their eyes and recognize the electric nature of the universe. They talk about magnetic waves inspace, but ignore electricity. However the only way to create a magnetic field is to use electric current. You can't divorce the two, they are inseparable. A magnetic field induces an electric current, and electric currents create magnetic fields. So to say one exists without the other is just lame. Physisicists need to pull their heads out and talk to their electrical engineers and plasma physicists who are testing theories in the labs and actually OBSERVING the stuff that makes up 90+ % of the universe.
2006-07-12 13:27:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Michael Gmirkin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A lot of decent answers and a few idiots getting their 2 points.
A black hole can be one OR MORE stars collapsed to the point of almost nothing. Is it sill matter or just energy? Not really sure.
Now, does the gravity of a collapsed star increase to be more than the original star?
Current theories has a giant black hole at the center of the milky way "glueing" the galaxy together.
2006-07-12 09:52:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by i wear one button suit 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
A black hole isn't actually a hole, first off. It's a chunk of mass so massive that, past a certain point as you approach it (called the "event horizon"), nothing can escape the pull of its gravity.
The actual chunk of mass is said to have no size, since it collapses in on itself because of its gravitational pull...so there's really nothing inside of it, since there's no "inside" at all.
2006-07-12 09:42:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by extton 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
well i know that gravity is so strong there that even light do not escape its force, hence the name. Earth would be squashed into a 1 cm3 sized ball , i think atoms at that tremendous weight loses their structure - one chaotic environs. You must realise though that these r based on Einstein's theories, not proven fact as of yet,
2006-07-12 09:41:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to the NEW UNIFIED FIELDS THEORY of my creation, a black hole would have the following internal phenoms and structure:
1). two spherical boundries, or EVENT HORIZONS are involved. the first, is the gravitational boundry, (the one most of us are familiar with) once a particle of mass or a wave of energy (light) crosses this boundry, it is doomed to eventually cross the second boundry...
The second boundry is the physical surface of the black hole.
It is inside this sphere that I believe the forces of the WEAK NUCLEAR FIELD, THE STRONG NUCLEAR FIELD, and GRAVITY converge and coalesce. (Since they are all caused by the same TENSING of space-time) In this proccess, Energy is transfered to Space-time.
Therefor to answer the conjecture of one of the above answerers, the force of gravity contributed to the black hole by the mass of one star WOULD BE GREATER due to the unification of these three forces.
The gravitational constant would increase, and greatly so. Driven by the combined energy of the forces listed above.
However, in the region between the "NO-ESCAPE" horizon and the "PHYSICAL HORIZON" there would be extreme electromagnetic currents.
I can't describe this region fully at this time, but in all likely hood it would be very violent and churning. Particles of matter would be distorting beyond recognition and you would probably observe accelerated atomic decay, and sub elementary particle fission or "sublimation" (similar to evaporation).
Spontaneous Nuclear Fusion would occur, very near the NO-ESCAPE horizon, releasing huge amounts of energy that would not be able to escape, and would appear to be "reflected" back toward the UNIFICATION HORIZON.
Hydrogen Fusion may well be occurring just outside the "NO-ESCAPE" horizon.
Since the volume of any particle would be decreasing, the ratio of Space-time to Energy-mass for all particles would be decreasing, MEANING THATsince in normal space-time more points inside a particle are points which contain no mass, they are simply space-time, the ratio of space-time points to mass-energy points is always Space-Time > Mass-Energy. (FOR THE VOLUME OF ANY PARTICLE IN NORMAL SPACE-TIME)
Inside the "NO-ESCAPE" horizon this ratio is heading toward equality. Space-time is being squeezed out of matter. Since Space-time contains energy, energy is being liberated.
The CASIMIR FORCE plays a roll here but I don't understand that yet.
Also, thru all this, as you get closer to singularity TIME DILATATION is increasing, and the perception of time to all things is slowing down, rapidly.
2) The statement that, "nothing escapes a black hole" is wrong. OBVIOUSLY, GRAVITY ESCAPES A BLACK HOLE. Since Gravity waves can escape a black hole, they cannot be mediated by material GRAVITONS. No construct of Mass-Energy can escape.
Therefor, Gravity waves must be comprised of some fundamentally different "CORPUS" or some "material" composed of different dimensional "stuff". (VACCUUM ENERGY)(That is a highly scientific definition!)
Undoubtedly, in the intervening "ELECTROMAGNETIC TURBULENCE ZONE" there would be shortlived forms of matter not seen anywhere else in nature. Shortlived because they would eventualy be sucked into the CONVERGENCE HORIZON , and crushed.
In recap, the anatomy of a black hole would be the NO-ESCAPE horizon, applying to all Mass-Energy, The ELECTROMAG TURBULENCE ZONE, where the Space-time to Mass-Energy ratio is falling and strange shortlived forms of matter may exists.
Then comes the FIELD UNIFICATION horizon, where three fundamental forces coalesce, causing a steep rise in the gravitational constant.
Inside that, Mass would still exist, but in an unkown form.
Clearly as you probe deeper into the singularity zone, Mass comes under increasing challenge to it's very existence.
Electric and Magnetic fields would not escape this event horizon. But would they still exist? What would happen to Nuetrinos? Particles so small they pass thru normal matter.
Would they become the incident particle for PROTOMATTER FISSION?
??????????????????
2006-07-12 11:05:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by virtualscientist01 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
When a star became smaller and smaller because of its own gravitation, it makes an enorm hole in Mat of space and time!!
So there must be some particuls in side the black hole!! it's extrimity must be a type of ball with great mass and gravity!!
2006-07-12 10:09:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rm 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
an infinitesmally small point which has a lot of gravity. I remember reading that if u go thru a black hole u come into a place outside of time.
2006-07-12 11:16:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by iammisc 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is nothing "inside" a black hole. A black hole is a star that went supernova and collapsed into itself. It became so dense that not even light could escape its gravity.
Perhaps you meant wormhole?
2006-07-12 09:41:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jake 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You cannot really say because the world as we know it breaks down beyond the edge (event horizon) of a black hole. Very lightly one can say a black hole if full of immense amounts of energy, almost infinite.
2006-07-12 09:39:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sporadic 3
·
0⤊
0⤋