2006-07-12 09:25:55 · 8 answers · asked by lilmissygirlz 1 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Music & Music Players
An iPod uses a hard drive for storage, can generally store many more songs, but is bigger and heavier (and more prone to breakage).
An iPod Nano uses flash memory, which is much smaller than a hard drive, so the Nano is much lighter, has no moving parts (so will not break as easily), but has the downside of less storage space.
If exercise, such as running, is important to you, the Nano would be the better choice.
2006-07-12 09:28:32 · answer #1 · answered by Titanium Squirrel 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nanos only come in 2 Gig and 4 Gig, and they are physically smaller.
2006-07-12 16:26:55 · answer #2 · answered by PiccChick12 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a nano is smaller and holds 1000 songs
2006-07-12 16:30:22 · answer #3 · answered by Jody J 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the nano is smaller in size and in memory plus it doesnt play video
2006-07-12 16:29:39 · answer #4 · answered by Jbeezy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a nano is smaller
2006-07-12 16:28:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a nano has less memory
2006-07-12 16:27:15 · answer #6 · answered by bigian1179 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nano is smaller?
2006-07-12 16:27:00 · answer #7 · answered by littlebopeep 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
an normally ipod is much larger and can hold videos and 7,000-15,000 songs,The ipod nao is much smaller and can hol from 250-1,000 song .Both models can hold picture .the normally ipod can hold so many more though
2006-07-12 16:30:23 · answer #8 · answered by spazywaffles 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋