Please explain your own definition of 'global dimming' vs. global warming?

Question

No scientific jargons etc, just your personal opinion, please!


(10 points)

Answer 1

We are up the proverbial polluted tributary with either a means of propulsion vs. we are without a means of propulsion.

Answer 2

Global dimming is the result of all the scientifically illiterate dimbulbs who believe in the Al Gore enviro-nazi version of global warming. They make the world collectively dumber.

Answer 3

See links:

Answer 4

"What we'd want to continually be accomplishing is the equilibrium between both" this can be very complicated to do, seeing as aerosols in ordinary words have an atmospheric existence of at maximum some a lengthy time period, even as CO2 has an atmospheric existence of as a lot as a number of hundred years, with some (very few) molecules lasting as a lot as a number of thousand. "if the dimensions is tipped on the warming part, lets be ending like Venus ( a planet with deadly greenhouse result and in route of the sunlight )" ought to we please give up evaluating the elements of Venus to Earth's climate? You already suggested one large difference between both planets (Venus being in route of the sunlight), lets look at some extra: Earth: a million AU Magnetic field a million satellite tv for pc Orbital era 365.256366 days Sidereal rotation era 0.997258 d common orbital % 29.783 km/s Axial tilt 23.439281° Inclination Reference (0) 7.25° to sunlight’s equator floor stress one hundred and one.3 kPa (MSL) Water clouds seventy 8.08% Nitrogen (N2) 20.ninety 5% Oxygen (O2) 0.ninety 3% Argon 0.038% Carbon dioxide hint water vapor (varies with climate) Venus: .7 AU No magnetic field No satellite tv for pc Orbital era 224.70069 day Sidereal rotation era ?243.0185 day Synodic era 583.ninety 2 days common orbital % 35.02 km/s Axial tilt 177.36° Inclination 3.39471° 3.86° to sunlight’s equator floor stress 9.3 MPa Sulphur clouds ~ninety six.5% Carbon dioxide ~3.5% Nitrogen .0.5% Sulfur dioxide .007% Argon .002% Water vapor .0017% Carbon monoxide .0012% Helium .0007% Neon hint Carbonyl sulfide hint Hydrogen chloride hint Hydrogen fluoride And Venus' surroundings is round ninety circumstances extra vast than ours. there is not any actual way lets finally end up like Venus (or Mars). "and a lot of my professors say at the moment , global warming is extra like a political theory than a actual scientifically shown one." Theories won't be able to be shown, and anthropogenic global warming is a theory, yet your professors are properly acceptable in keeping that AGW is many times political right now. Too many holes contained in the perception and too many uncertainties with climate usually. higher CO2 might want to reason some warming, how a lot isn't commonly used.

Answer 5

repubs don't believe the national academy of sciences. they believe the pill popper.

Answer 6

I find both to be ridiculous notions.