yes! we should ! i hate him and bush! i hate them all! they make me so ******* angry! damn it i could go on for hours!
2006-07-12 07:26:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
that is a surety. vacation a US Agent, with the end results of such multiple human beings death, is a diverse reason for a minimum of an study. information ought to really aspect out incorrect doing, and treasonous habit. My feeling is that an study will be blocked by employing Congress. that's wrongful too, yet there is little we are able to do about it. even as politicians are bought and paid for, that is hard to get the guidelines enforced. funds talks, no longer the individuals. usa of america isn't the rustic my grandfather fought for, and that's no longer the rustic I remember transforming into up in anymore. we are on the verge of being electorate of an extremely undesirable position. imagine Germany contained in the 1930's... I voted for Obama, yet i imagine he's operating scared acceptable this second. there is not any different reason behind why issues are going the same way as for the time of Bush. Bush gave the Corporatists the rustic, and Obama won't be able to take it decrease back.
2016-11-06 06:42:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by kinnu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You must love the New York Times, by the way Rove a True American was not charged by the special prosecutor Fitzgerald even after Novak revealed him as a source to Fitzgerald. Do you need a kleenex?
2006-07-12 07:42:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What Novack said has been misrepresented here. I read his column (see link)
This is what happened. Rove and "someone else" told Novack "Joe Wilson's wife is a CIA agent". Novack looks up Joe Wilson in Who's Who. In that article he finds out Joe Wilson's wife's name is Valerie Plame. The Who's Who article does not say That Plame is a CIA agent. Joe Wilson did not publish anything -- he neither publishes nor writes article for Who's Who.
Wilson did not tell Novack anything.
So Rove gets off on the technicality that he did not "name" a CIA agent.
Read the article and correct me if I'm wrong.
2006-07-12 08:26:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you are kinda nuts, but I do agree the Carl Rove should be fired - for going to La Raza, one of the most blatant racist organizations in the country today. Whats next, he going to the KKK and then over to the New Black Panthers?
2006-07-12 07:27:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, according to Robert novak the guy who published valerie Plaimes name it was her own Husband, Joe Wilson who told him that Valerie Plaime was a CIA agent. Go Post your comments at Move on .org from now on. I am sick of you.
All you Bush haters go blog at Move on.org.
2006-07-12 07:43:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by stick man 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
joker, you little idiot, name the treasonous crime commited by rove. you can't. on the other hand, murtha, durbin, the new york times, and many other lefties ARE guilty of giving aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war, which IS treason
2006-07-12 07:44:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by john m 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Treason??
I don't like the guy either, but where's the treason?? Isn't treason punishable by death? You wanna kill the guy because he's "shifty?"
Chill. Vote out the people who put him in power. Welcome to democracy.
2006-07-12 09:07:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by PI Joe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wouldn't he have to be a US citizen for that?
2006-07-12 07:24:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rocketman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
why
2006-07-12 07:56:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by MIKE B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋