English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-12 07:14:13 · 13 answers · asked by Lone Gunmin 2 in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

I am so glad i moved out of new york.

NO

2006-07-12 07:45:03 · answer #1 · answered by larrybob 2 · 0 0

No. The only chance we've got at cleaning up the mess we're in is to put forward candidates with appeal across a broad spectrum of voters. Sadly, the female/gay issues are still much too polarizing, and would alienate moderate Republicans and conservative Democrats alike.
I could support Hillary as the candidate for Vice-President. She'd have a real shot, with a good Presidential candidate. If she did a good job, she would probably have broad support for a Presidential bid later on.

2006-07-12 17:50:29 · answer #2 · answered by functionary01 4 · 0 0

No. Hillary Clinton is the wrong choice for President. It's more important right now to oust the religious right, than it is to elect a woman. We can do that later. If we don't get rid of these clowns, women won't even be able to vote in 10 years.

2006-07-12 14:20:16 · answer #3 · answered by poecile 3 · 0 0

Barney Fife maybe...Hilary not!

2006-07-12 14:18:14 · answer #4 · answered by Bear Naked 6 · 0 0

No. I like Sam Nunn and Jimmy Carter.

2006-07-12 14:17:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes.

2006-07-12 14:17:20 · answer #6 · answered by The Foosaaaah 7 · 0 0

When the cow jumps over the moon.

2006-07-12 14:17:32 · answer #7 · answered by therandman 5 · 0 0

In theory yes, in practice no - because they would never win

2006-07-12 14:20:10 · answer #8 · answered by Bluedetroitgirl 3 · 0 0

I think they are both on record as knowing how to spell "support", so I guess they'd be more qualified than you!

2006-07-12 14:19:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes

2006-07-12 14:18:18 · answer #10 · answered by f1le_f0und 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers