Why is it that at least 50% of reviews for movies and shows come from people that had already known they wouldn't have liked any parts of the movie, but yet were stupid enough to watch it and complain. It's like the Blue Collar Tour and the TV show (which I love both). Like, 75% of the reviews is like, "They suck! I didn't like them to begin with but I watched their show anyway. Trust me, don't waste 7 bucks on this stupid show. Now go Get-"Er"-Done you stupid rednecks." I can waste 7 bucks because I like. It's too obvious these people are the ones lacking a brain. This is like reading reviews of a slasher movie. People are like, "Don't see this, it has gore and and stuff in it." No flippin' way. It's a slasher movie. Anyway, what do ya'll think?
2006-07-12 05:48:33 · 2 answers · asked by Brian.E 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I find it best to read reviews from edited sites rather than ones where anyone can review the film. These public sites are OK, but it is best to read several professional opinions, I think. I particularly like empireonline.co.uk and timeout.com. There is a place for public comments but it can get too much and sink to the lowest level of 'reaction rather than review'
2006-07-12 05:54:21 · answer #1 · answered by furthur 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
true story...I hate that too
2006-07-12 14:10:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋