Bush always says his actions are to protect the interests of the US. What about us, the rest of the world?!?

Question

What about us, the rest of the world, don't we exist to have our own interests? Don't the people of Irak for example have their own interests, to live and be governed by the way and by the people THEY deem is the best for them? America has invaded Irak with the pretense of looking for WMD, but the whole world knew what they were upto: OIL

Blood-for-oil in the interest of the Americans

The global economy is going assunder, and it is all because of Bush's policy. Shoot first, ask questions later. Typical Texan style, I would say, but this is not a joke. Soring oil prices, increase in terrorism, instable global economy, wars, and so many other calamities all are the resultant effects of "American interests" under Bush's governance.

What do you think?

Answer 1

He is the US President, his priority is always for America. But at least, the US does lend assistance to the rest of the World. What would the UN be without the US? What happen to NATO less US? I could go on and on.

Why are grumbling for? Do you think Ahmedihejad of Iran and Kil Jong Il care for the world, or even their own people?

Do you think Hamas cares about Israeli children?

Do you think the Presidents of China and Russia, care about what happens in Iraq, or anywhere else in the world? Or do they only think of themselves first, their country second and not concern themselves about the World?

Before you slag President Bush or the US off, think about all this!

I know I'd rather still have Bush in charge of the US, and remain the dominant world power than any political leader in the whole world, including Kofi Anan, Jacques Chirac, King Abdullah et al.

He ain't perfect but he's better than the rest!

Answer 2

The problems are not only caused by the actions of Bush alone, the big problem is the Republican majority government who allow and support what Bush is doing.

They have enough money and power to rig any election and I am disappointed that the Democrats haven't figure that out yet. Our nation is headed down if we don't stop our so-called leaders form painting the wrong picture of us.

Also keep in mind that we (Americans) are the people of all parts of the world. The true Americans (the Indians) are at the bottom of the righteous American society. Just think about that!!

Coco

Answer 3

That is not his primary role. It is up to our government to protect us. If Iraq was about oil, so what, oil is vital to the west. Maybe Saudi oil was becoming less reliable. Terrorism existed long before 9/11 & 7/7 and long before the Invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq. Are we supposed to let Muslim terrorists spread their evil unchallenged? I agree with you on one point, that western economies are in a serious mess. But that has been building up for many years, in the form of massive, and ever increasing, state fiscal/balance of payment deficits, and personal debts. In America and the UK it has been exaccerbated by a cheap money policy leading to huge house price inflation and related personal borrowing.

What would you do about the terrorist threat? you can't ignore it, because it won't go away.

Many arguments I read about the Iraq war completely ignore what Sadam was doing to his own people.

Answer 4

OK.as Bush says his actions are to protect USA.intrests.Never forget wars earn big money for home industry;create employment;advance technology,test weapons which have a use by date,also generally reduce inflation while the war lasts.War without oil is not viable in this age,look where the wars are.USA backing of Israel is because of the need for the US to have a strong partner in this oil region and why Israel can maintain illegal nuclear weapons with no protest from the US.As for the rest of the World the USA.don't give a fig.

Answer 5

While I don't agree totally with the way things have been handled under Bush's reign, I do support him. He has a duty to protect our country and he is doing what needed to be done a long time ago. I don't like to see innocent people die, but war is not pretty. The rest of the world has their own way of doing things and I don't think we should be involved in those matters. However, when those countries ask or expect aid from us, they can't expect that we won't be involved in their affairs. The truth is the rest of the world doesn't want to be free from U.S. involvement, they rely on us for too many things, just as we rely on them.

Answer 6

Your interests are your government's responsibility.

I'd rethink the oil assertion in this regard, all western economies require oil to remain viable. An uniterrupted oil supply certainly is in every modern nation's interest...the real American interest here is to insure oil for all modern economies for without it trade would cease and all would suffer very serious consequences. American interests are served by a healthy world economy for without that the American economy suffers as well.

Answer 7

Sorry but that's why we give you foreign aid
to use the money generated by the overtaxed American
Taxpayer, to help you to help yourself.
Now if you want to take that foreign aid and waste it then that's up to you.
You really ought to try to start to take responsibility for yourselves.
You love to hate us, except when the cash register is ringing
Same with the United Nations
It would make me very happy and I'm sure alot of other American Taxpayers happy to see that veritable Institution move on out of the USA.
Maybe setup shop in France, let French taxpayers foot the bill for
a while.

Answer 8

What a contradictory question.

First you accuse Bush of solely invading Iraq for their OIL. You know, that 'blood for oil' bullsh*t.

Then you turn around and say that oil prices are soaring.

Yea, I know...everyone wrong on EARTH is Bush's fault. Check.

So why aren't we bathing in oil here in the US?? I should have a swimming pool filled with oil since we invaded Iraq for their oil - right?

Why, INSTEAD, am I paying $3.00 a gallon for it?

I love how people shoot their mouths off without knowing the facts.

Answer 9

Do something about it then. The WMD's have been found
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38213
The problem is the media doesn't want you to know because they sell more papers with drama than that a boys....
Wait until election time. The democrats are going to be eating crow and loosing more seats in the government. Ask your self this Why doesn't the media say wmds haven't been found anymore?

Answer 10

vp Lyndon B. Johnson grew to grow to be President Lyndon B. Johnson with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. previous to the Assassination, President John F. Kennedy had unique NASA as a cupboard aspect branch with headquarters at Cape Canaveral, Florida. the former Manned area software a R&D challenge became a Texas depending operation. Many presumed that the headquarters for NASA should be Houston, Texas. President Lyndon B. Johnson replaced the NASA headquarters from Cape Canaveral, FL to Houston, TX. previous to Assassination President John F. Kennedy widespread a relief human beings involvement in South East Asia(Vietnam). President Lyndon B. Johnson approved escalation human beings militia involvement in South East Asia(Vietnam). significant defence contracts for KBR previous to 9/11 US militia operations and spending were constrained. After 9/11 President George W. Bush orchestrates US invasion of Iraq. militia spending has lengthy gone by the roof again. significant defence contracts for Halliburton. keep in techniques Vietnam? internet search for for both KBR or Halliburton.