2006-07-12 05:06:27 · 6 answers · asked by Konfuzius 3 in Social Science ➔ Anthropology
China does have veto power in the Security Council, India doesn't; India was a British Colony when the Security Council was set-up.
Anyway, even ignoring the idea of reconciling democracy and veto power, we don't have to look very far to see that majorities have no voice.
In some countries women do not have the right to vote, in others people in jail, sometimes people get barred from voting because they spent time in jail, or did not vote the previous time, some people cannot vote because voting takes place on a working day, voting is restricted to people of a certain age... There are many ways of preventing people from voting.
But then again, you should ask whether that majority with no voice does try to obtain a voice; power is rarely given, it is taken.
2006-07-18 16:50:47 · answer #1 · answered by ekonomix 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well u r partially right, india hasnt got VETO but china does, they are a permanent member of UN.
2006-07-12 12:17:58 · answer #2 · answered by samuel hugo 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lot of misfotune----india is suppresion right of liberty-there many cast----so un o know it---people are poor---so that could be a member---whil china is power -----it prove that yu study more-go uno and ask them to favour fr poor india
2006-07-19 11:03:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
All sheep... like "lambs to the slaughter?" You've made a definite point here... trouble is they no longer need us to wage their wars and we're all fast becoming the innocent bystanders a.k.a. "expected collateral damage." - Too bad, SO sad! And what's really pathetic, is all "the writing was on the walls," and we, collectively, have failed to act.
2006-07-12 14:53:36 · answer #4 · answered by cherodman4u 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the rich do get richer & the poor do get poorer
2006-07-12 16:52:52 · answer #5 · answered by Ustra 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they need stronger cough medicine
2006-07-12 12:11:57 · answer #6 · answered by stephie 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋