I'm starting to doubt that Katie Holmes was even pregnant to begin with. Katie Holmes gave birth to Suri Cruise in April, the same day Brooke Shields had her kid, Grier. They were born in the same hospital by the same nurse. TMZ.com obtained both Suri and Griers birth certificates. Both have the nurse registration number wrong. But at least Brooke has been seen with Grier. The other odd thing was, California law requires a birth certificate to be obtained within 10 days after birth. Grier's took 9 days while Suri's took 16. All recent photos of Katie show her socializing with friends but don't you think she'd at least take her baby along.
Last thing. Katie anounced that she was pregnant in June 2005. Which means Suri was probably conceived in May. She gave birth in April 2006. That means she was 11 months pregnant. Plus several tabloid photos are very inconsistent with her pregnancy. Do you think Suri actually exists?
2006-07-12 04:54:22 · 14 answers · asked by christigmc 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Not me, I think she is fake. I really do think its a stunt. I mean I know every celeb wants privacy but living in hollywood it is impossible to hide a baby that long. holy crap, I didn't even think about the time frame, you are so right, it was way longer than nine months. They got engaged before one movie, pregnant before one and then "had Suri" before MI 3 came out. and I saw something yesterday saying that the birth certificate is a fake. I'll be interested to see how they get out of this one, but I'm with you I think it was all a hoax. I mean she was oddly shaped. I know everyones pregnancy is different but I've never seen a woman look that weird pregnant.
2006-07-12 05:32:29 · answer #1 · answered by Muffin 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Let's cruise on by here now. Is it possible that the tacky wacky Scientology's sacrifice their first born by disemboweling, dismembering and blood sucking? Or, has the baby been pickled in a brine jar for a Scientology's break away cult to have a being to worship?
2006-07-12 05:02:40 · answer #2 · answered by slivers 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i heard this morning that katie took suri with her to a drug store and the pharmacist or someone there seen her and said suri looked funny. Maybe there is something wrong with her face or something and they arent gona show her til they fix it. who know!
2006-07-12 05:33:49 · answer #3 · answered by ~luv my pups!.~ 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I do exactly not care anymore. i imagine the media are going to get extremely bored to death in Tom's antics very quickly and with the help of the time he's waiting to unharness his turkey baster-conceived, devil toddler upon the international, no individual will provide a sh** anymore.
2016-11-01 22:15:13 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i think the baby actually exists...no katie holmes walked around with a pillow under her shirt for 9 months for publicity...okay whatever...
2006-07-12 05:09:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who knows. Tom Cruise is a freak.
2006-07-12 04:58:47 · answer #6 · answered by AsianPersuasion :) 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who cares? I certainly don't. I've had enough of Tom Cruise in the media.
2006-07-12 05:16:28 · answer #7 · answered by Garfield 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think she exists but the doctors told the family , she should not b photographed by reporteers, becuz then she'll have a peaceful life..funny haa??
2006-07-12 05:00:36 · answer #8 · answered by just me!!!! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't be for real....
Tell me you did not put all this time and effort into trying to analyze the existence of Suri Cruise.....Who cares?????
2006-07-12 05:00:17 · answer #9 · answered by Taffi 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
if suri actually DOES exist, which she probably does not, it would be a pretty baby. YEAH pretty Ugly! jk, but i still don't think exists.
2006-07-12 06:00:18 · answer #10 · answered by carli 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋