English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-12 04:11:05 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Economics

10 answers

maybe monopoly.

2006-07-12 04:14:05 · answer #1 · answered by BonesofaTeacher 7 · 0 0

Jesus Christ loves you and I do to. The KJV of the Holy Bible in The Gospel according to John 3:16
says:
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whosoever believeth on Him should not perish but have everlasting life.

Please get a King James Version of the Holy Bible and start reading John 1:1 and read and pray that God through the Holy Spirit will reveal the TRUTH to you.

God Bless You is My Prayer,

David

2006-07-12 06:58:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

When they buy without thinking what the prodict is doing to the world, or buy to have ten of one thing just because it was neat to look at, or buy because they seen it on someone else and since they liked it thought they were in style just for thinking it was nice then went to buy it.
So you take these people out shopping and the stores just love them, they want their pictures in thier ads, they want to put commercials on showing these people smiling their futures away unkowingly, they want to give them special offers because they have not learned to say no to anyone yet, even abusive men for example.
The people behind this industry need to be studied to get to the root of this evilness.
They are just like the consumers they manipulate, only have learned a few college tricks and still have not changed their hurts and angers from their childhoods and bad relationships.
So they put lots of mirriors in their stores to reflect their hurts and pains onto you.
Right, they all feel guilty from their unresolved hurts, so they occupy themselves with greed, thier instant adrenaline rush, and put it all in a wherehouse, have a grand opening and invite naieve folks in who will feel guilty because they left all that junk hangin on shelves and racks, so they buy it.
That my freind is consumer exploitation.
Please do your part to stop it at its source.

2006-07-12 06:04:38 · answer #3 · answered by littleblanket 4 · 0 0

information what factors are consisting of interior the product and no remember if or no longer any of those factors must be doubtlessly volatile (reason element consequences), also determining no remember if or no longer the cost of a product is fairly well worth it or if the buyer (that would want to be the guy finding out to purchase the product) must be finding out to purchase a more acceptable a lot low-priced style call (in the adventure that they could be getting the similar or on the point of the similar cost for his or her funds)...this could also be utilized to products bought in bulk and no remember if or no longer the buyer is definitely saving earnings finding out to purchase maximum individuals product extremely than the classic product or more suitable acceptable than between the classic product. also take care of in customer information is how promoting and promoting is utilized in attracting a consumers' interest. the buyer ought to look very carefully at any promoting to inform aside what sort of attitude the corporate company is employing and no remember if or no longer it extremely is pretend promoting...also the buyer ought to pay interest to the way promoting is utilized in finding out to purchase centers and shops with the intention to allure to a consumers' interest to a particular product.

2016-11-06 06:24:11 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

How are consumers exploited if no one is forced to buy the companie's wares? Besides, "let the buyer beware."

2006-07-12 12:30:17 · answer #5 · answered by Chx 2 · 0 0

Uneducated consumers

2006-07-12 04:14:54 · answer #6 · answered by ♠♣♥Rogue♣♥♠ 5 · 0 0

High Demand.

2006-07-12 04:29:20 · answer #7 · answered by thewordofgodisjesus 5 · 0 0

as far as i know, economics has not yet noticed that injustice is built right in to transaction: -- the two things exchanged cannot be equal in value [in work gone into them] even if the two parties are friendly, and not wanting to make a free buck - and of course in most 'ransacktions' both parties are happy to get more than they give - the two things must be worth x and x+y - so that every transaction is a fair exchange no robbery [x for x] plus a unilateral shift of wealth [work, value] from one to other, equal to y

over trillions of transactions, this effect will make a few profit largely, many profit small-ly, many lose small-ly, a few lose largely - ie, a bellshaped curve of shift of wealth - just by transaction

the effect is speeded up by most people's efforts to give as little and get as much as possible - it is the easiest thing in the world for a company to charge $11 for something worth $10 [ie, that has $10 worth of total human effort in it, including labour of company owners]

the customer cannot tell the value to the last cent

eg, toilet paper: embossed, so that a 200 sheet roll is as fat as a 300 sheet roll - then a 6 pack has the same number of sheets as a 4 pack, so gets a 6 pack price while only being a 4 pack

this is why the rich get richer and the poor get poorer - there is this constant unjust drift of wealth from earners to nonearners - which over 1000s of years just grows and grows - till now we have fortnightly pay from $1 to $1 billion

as soon as the injustice [ie, theft] becomes visible, it causes violence - so we have extreme injustice, extreme violence -

the growth of injustice is supported by plunder, conquering, colonialism, illegality, etc etc

money makes money, and contributes to the injustice [theft] -

humanity has not been smart enough to see and admit and properly compensate for this theft, and so has suffered increase of violence for 1000s of years - till now, thanks to e=mc2, on the brink of extinction

it is only necessary to limit fortunes to the most that one person can truly earn, ie create by their work, [US$2 million] and spreading any overfortunes among everyone, to bring world justice and peace - and fairpay of US$75,000 per family working av. hard

despite the enormous benefits, humanity seems unable to 'compute' the facts - 99% get better pay, 100% get enormous increase in happiness, and total increase in survival -

people are merely victims of a sneaky but vicious side effect of transaction - but seem to be unable to disengage from it

everyone seems to imagine they are on the winning side, although only 1% are on the winning side financially, and they suffer from the fact that danger increases proportionately with overpay, and pleasure suffers from rapidly diminishing returns with overpay - since all needs and most wants are satisfied by fairpay, leaving very little pleasure left for overpay to give - plus, now, thanks to e=mc2, a near future of extinction by ww3

everyone wants to keep wealth [overpay] although its net benefits are very negative for 100% of people - although the net benefits of justice are very great for 100%

a world of liberty, equality and fraternity where every family working av. hard is getting US$75,000 a year, would obviously be heaven on earth compared to the present chaos, danger and vast unnecessary suffering, but humans dont seem to be able to compute the idea

even though it was the basic idea underpinning the american dream - limit fortunes to what can be earned, to avoid a repetition of european tyranny - the idea is unknown today even in america

it just doesnt go in the human head -

if everyone who grasped it told just two people, every adult in the world would hear of it in just 31 times the time to tell two people, just by word of mouth alone - and then, with everyone seeing the huge benefits, it would be easy and painless and effortless to get the laws limiting fortunes, but as i say it just doesnt seem to compute in the old human head -

something evolutionary in the brain blocks it

2006-07-12 21:38:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

asymetric information

2006-07-12 17:17:52 · answer #9 · answered by mr.C 2 · 0 0

good example

http://www.usc.edu/libraries/archives/cityinstress/mccone/part8.html

2006-07-12 05:50:47 · answer #10 · answered by fzaa3's lover 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers