English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am in the miliitary, so don't think I am bashing it. Where are the WMDs? Why are we in this war? Why are so many Americans having to die? If Bush could run for a third term, would you vote to re-elect him? Vote Hillary!

2006-07-12 03:10:13 · 16 answers · asked by bobdabuilr 2 in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

Most of Hussein's top aides have admitted that they shipped all the weapons to Syria as soon as they were told (warned) that the UN was going to start inspections.

In addition, as a veteran of Desert Storm I can personally contest that there were WMD then. I and three of my squad have pictures of bunkers filled with chemical weapons. Now, these chemical weapons were never recorded to have been dismantled, but oh yeah, Saddam said he got rid of them all. He wouldn't lie to us.

2006-07-12 03:13:51 · answer #1 · answered by cirestan 6 · 0 0

Ugh, no more brand-name political dynasties. No more Bushes, no more Clintons, please. We can't take any more..

The 500 mustard/sarin shells they found a couple weeks back are holdovers from the Iran-Iraq conflict, not the hundreds of liters of biological agent or the hundreds of tons of chemical weapons we were TOLD the administration KNEW were in Iraq. Those 500 shells are NOT the reason we went to war. Go read the article on the FOXnews website, the DoD said the exact same.

Those of you with the "Syria has the WMDs", link up some proof or stfu. Parroting Rush doesn't make you factually correct :\

2006-07-12 10:18:58 · answer #2 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0 0

They were there, that is a fact that Hillary stated time and time again, as did John Kerry. Most reports and intelligence points to Syria. Either way, I agree that we need to find a way out of Iraq without leaving it in shambles just to watch it become another tentacle of Iran.

Perhaps we should just put Saddam back in power and allow the torture of innocent people to pick up where it left off. Or maybe we can let our military do their job and kill the enemies in this war so we can move on. Or we can just follow the laughable, impotent idiots that have learned nothing from history like yourself, and do absolutely no good whatsoever unless it doesn't hurt some one's feelings like the laughable, impotent idiots or even the enemy(imagine that).

2006-07-12 10:28:43 · answer #3 · answered by etmetter 2 · 0 0

WMD - Weapons of Mass Destruction meaning bombs, atom bomds, nukes, missiles etc.

We are in this war coz Bush pushed us into it and becoz he's a fool.

So many Americans are having to die becoz Bush doesn't give a damn about how many people die in this war. All he cares about is VICTORY

i would rather die than vote for Bush. he's caused enough destruction already - and i'm not gonna let him do more.

2006-07-12 10:15:29 · answer #4 · answered by cutiepie_4ever 2 · 0 0

the war isn't about WMDs nor was it ever...

Terrorists, people...its a war on Terror...

we attacked in Iraq because they were harboring terrorists...

Saddam was known to support terrorists, and well, duh der der....Bush declared a war on terror, did he not?

so hmmmm...afghanistan = terrorists = war on terror....Taliban dismantled, the hunt for Bin Laden never ended....

Iraq = terrorist = war on terror...Saddam regime dismantled, Al-Qaeda in Iraq shaken and in disarray...

And governments by the people have been set up...by the people...

please get your facts straight....

Consider this:

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security."


There's your Hillary Clinton...

In 2002.

2006-07-12 10:32:29 · answer #5 · answered by Aidan316 2 · 0 0

Yes, I will vote for Bush when he runs for a third term in '08. Believe it, Wmd's have been found in Iraq. You don't sound like one of our brave troopers, but if you are, talk with your NCO's and they will fill you in on why the USA is fighting in the mideast. You sound like a pussyfoot uninformed whiner.

2006-07-12 10:32:00 · answer #6 · answered by lighthouse 4 · 0 0

you're a liar. anyone in the military would NEVER want another clinton in the white house after the somalia debacle. also, if in fact you really are in the military, how did you not hear about all those artillery shells that were found recently containing chemical weapons (WMD'S)? the rest of the world heard about it and the media just non-chalantly brushed it aside like it wasn't important. .......i'm calling your bluff, hippie.

2006-07-12 10:17:02 · answer #7 · answered by zoo2626 4 · 0 0

you see bush was getting high off some cocaine and started illusioning that there are weapons of mass destruction. carl rove is a good friend of the family and cheney of corse owns haliburton so they said hey lets take over iraq which is the worlds 2nd largest oil reserve. what we do is use the american tax payers dollars to fight this war and reep the benifits for us and our rich friends who own the oil companies. then once we gain control of iraq we are going to go for iran and syria to join the terroristic israelis in taking over the middle east. and the sad thing is the only ones who are sacraficing their lives for this war are poorer american people. the rich never go to war the poorer citizens are the ones who loose their lives fighting for the rich to get richer. no i would not vote for him. i do not like any of the vote choices any one who is pro israel i do not believe they really do what is good for america or are morally correct. any government who is willing to send my fellow country men off to war with out propable cause is not worth the dog poo off my shoe. we should have voted ralph nader and i am sorry that you are in the military.

2006-07-12 10:20:23 · answer #8 · answered by wedjb 6 · 0 0

Actually their they found a small cache of warheads a couple of weeks ago, but the media barely covered it....go figure. What hasn't been explained is the hundreds of trucks seen going to Syria in the weeks leading up to the war.

2006-07-12 10:14:42 · answer #9 · answered by jpxc99 3 · 0 0

I guess there are some ignorant people in the military, IF you ARE in the military! You HAVE to be a socialist female to even think of Hillary, she would even lose to McCain.

2006-07-12 10:16:23 · answer #10 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers