even no one can say it with confirmity but u can get some information from this. i hope it will help u.
RACIAL & ETHNIC DISTRIBUTION of ABO BLOOD TYPES
RACIAL & ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN DISTRIBUTION OF HUMAN ABO BLOOD TYPE GROUPS; DIFFERENT COUNTRY - DIFFERENT ABO GROUPING; INDIVIDUAL RACES HAVE COMMON BLOOD TYPES.
There are racial and ethnic differences in Blood type and composition. The ABO Blood group system was discovered in 1901 and since it is of major importance in medicine, samples have been diligently collected from the most remote of people groups for a century. Of no other human characteristic is so much data available. Most populations have migrated and mixed. Unfortunately the reliability of the Blood data for assessing relationships between population groups is very limited. This is mostly due to the lack of availability of this important data. As the chart reveals, the frequency and purity of the four main ABO Blood groups varies in populations throughout the world. Great variation occurs in different groups within a given country; even a small country, as one ethnic group mixes, or not, with another.
Publishing the ethnic differences in Blood type and the racial differences in Blood type is not, in the present-day world, considered to be politically correct. We compile and maintain this database through often times confidential sources. Every Blood gathering entity in the world must gather this information to stay in business, but almost every one of them is afraid to publish the racial and ethnic differences in Blood type, given the emotionally charged political climate.
VIEW ABO BLOOD TYPE INFORMATION
For example, early European races are characterized by a very low type B frequency, and a relatively high type A frequency while the Asiatic races are characterized by a high frequency of types A and B. The following chart does not consider Rh factor and may vary in specific regions. It is also different for some very particular racial or ethnic groups. We have highlighted interesting pure anomalies.
The frequency with which Blood types are observed is determined by the frequency with which the three alleles of the ABO gene are found in different parts of the world. Variation in this allele frequency of the ABO gene reflects the social tendency of populations to marry and reproduce within their national, regional, or ethnic group. As people throughout the world intermingle to a greater degree, the distribution of the different Blood types will continue to become more uniform. Red cell antigens are the pheno-typical expression of our inherited genes. One of the most common questions that we get is about the the ethnic and racial distribution of human Blood groups. In response, following here is our collection of basic ABO Blood group data, sorted by people groups.
One note; we do not consider the very small percentage of individuals who inherit unusual combinations of "minor" antigens. Everyone carries substances on their red Blood cells, called antigens. In addition to the well known ABO classified groupings, and Rh factor, there are over 260 "minor" antigens that have been identified. These antigens may appear in varying combinations. The presence or absence of these specific "minor" antigens single out that particular Blood type as being "rare." All Blood types are inherited and therefore certain rare Blood combinations are more common in specific ethnic and racial groups. We review this subject HERE. Discount coupons for DNA tests.
Pharmacy shelves are stocked with do-it-yourself home tests for Blood glucose, Blood cholesterol paternity tests and pregnancy tests. OraSure Technologies Inc., makes and sells a 20-minute, at-home test that screens for two HIV strains using a swab device that tests saliva, awaiting the FDA.
There is precise and up-to-date data available. These racial and ethnic Blood typing and population migration statistics are important in modern medicine for many reasons. The overriding problem in obtaining and publishing this information in the United States, and to a slightly lesser extent in Western Europe, is political correctness. It is not nice to talk about the ways that I may be different from you!
This data has some holes in it; there are national and/or ethic groups whose statistics are not known to BloodBook.com. Those are noted with a Unknown - Please Submit Data. If you can contribute accurate data to BloodBook.com, please click HERE. We encourage to visit the Bloodmobile. Free discount coupons for DNA testing.
We are grateful for the many recent updates from Blood professionals and Blood Banks and DNA parental test facilities around the world. This program is working well, thanks to you period-red.gif (63 bytes)
Link - BloodBook.com Race and Ethnicity Blood Type Analysis Chart Link - BloodBook.com
Link - BloodBook.com Rare Blood Types Link - BloodBook.com
Link - BloodBook.com ABO Blood Type Distribution Geographic Study Link - BloodBook.com
A Word about DNA Genealogy and Anthropology Testing - DNA research on full-blooded indigenous populations from around the world has led to the discovery and documentation of genetic markers that are unique to populations, ethnicity and/or deep ancestral migration patterns. The markers having very specific modes of inheritance, and which are relatively unique to specific populations, are used to assess probabilities of ancestral relatedness. Available services include: Ancestral Heritage DNA testing, Native American DNA Verification, Y-Chromosome DNA Testing and mtDNA Sequence Analysis.
VISIT THE BLOODMOBILE :: NATIONAL BLOOD REPORT :: FLORIDA BLOOD CENTER LINKS :: SELLING SPERM
NEW YORK PLASMA :: CALIFORNIA PLASMA :: FLORIDA BLOOD PLASMA :: NATIONAL PLASMA CENTERS
MERCURY - THIMEROSAL™ IN VACCINES - AUTISM, MERCURY TOXIN :: AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD DONATION
Click on the letter below to jump alphabetically.
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | | J | K | L | M | N | P | R | S | T | U | V | W
PEOPLE GROUP
clear.gif (807 bytes)
O
clear.gif (807 bytes)
A
clear.gif (807 bytes)
B
clear.gif (807 bytes)
AB
clear.gif (807 bytes)
Aborigines 61 39 0 0
Abyssinians 43 27 25 5
Ainu (Japan) 17 32 32 18
Albanians 38 43 13 6
Grand Andamanese 9 60 23 9
Arabs 34 31 29 6
Armenians 31 50 13 6
Asian (in USA - General) 40 28 27 5
Austrians 36 44 13 6
Bantus 46 30 19 5
Basques 51 44 4 1
Belgians 47 42 8 3
Blackfoot (N. Am. Indian) 17 82 0 1
Bororo 100 0 0 0
Brazilians 47 41 9 3
Bulgarians 32 44 15 8
Burmese 36 24 33 7
Buryats 33 21 38 8
Bushmen 56 34 9 2
Chinese-Canton 46 23 25 6
Chinese-Peking 29 27 32 13
Chuvash 30 29 33 7
Czechs 30 44 18 9
Danes 41 44 11 4
Dutch 45 43 9 3
Egyptians 33 36 24 8
English 47 42 9 3
Eskimos (Alaska) 38 44 13 5
Eskimos (Greenland) 54 36 23 8
Estonians 34 36 23 8
Fijians 44 34 17 6
Finns 34 41 18 7
French 43 47 7 3
Georgians 46 37 12 4
Germans 41 43 11 5
Greeks 40 42 14 5
Gypsies (Hungary) 29 27 35 10
Hawaiians 37 61 2 1
Hindus (Bombay) 32 29 28 11
Hungarians 36 43 16 5
Icelanders 56 32 10 3
Indians (India - General) 37 22 33 7
Indians (USA - General) 79 16 4 1
Irish 52 35 10 3
Italians (Milan) 46 41 11 3
Japanese 30 38 22 10
Jews (Germany) 42 41 12 5
Jews (Poland) 33 41 18 8
Kalmuks 26 23 41 11
Kikuyu (Kenya) 60 19 20 1
Koreans 28 32 31 10
Lapps 29 63 4 4
Latvians 32 37 24 7
Lithuanians 40 34 20 6
Malasians 62 18 20 0
Maoris 46 54 1 0
Mayas 98 1 1 1
Moros 64 16 20 0
Navajo (N. Am. Indian) 73 27 0 0
Nicobarese (Nicobars) 74 9 15 1
Norwegians 39 50 8 4
Papuas (New Guinea) 41 27 23 9
Persians 38 33 22 7
Peru (Indians) 100 0 0 0
Philippinos 45 22 27 6
Poles 33 39 20 9
Portuguese 35 53 8 4
Rumanians 34 41 19 6
Russians 33 36 23 8
Sardinians 50 26 19 5
Scotts 51 34 12 3
Serbians 38 42 16 5
Shompen (Nicobars) 100 0 0 0
Slovaks 42 37 16 5
South Africans 45 40 11 4
Spanish 38 47 10 5
Sudanese 62 16 21 0
Swedes 38 47 10 5
Swiss 40 50 7 3
Tartars 28 30 29 13
Thais 37 22 33 8
Turks 43 34 18 6
Ukranians 37 40 18 6
United Kingdom (GB) 47 42 8 3
USA (blacks) 49 27 20 4
USA (whites) 45 40 11 4
2006-07-12 02:47:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Illusive One 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Ethnic Blood Types
2016-12-18 08:00:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, the ancestry sites are not useless. You just don't know what you are doing on them. Secondly, a DNA test cannot tell you what countries anyone comes from. They can only tell you about regions of the world your ancestors came from. They can tell you that you have European heritage, but cannot tell you if your European ancestors were from Italy or France, or Scotland, or where ever. Countries don't have blood types. People in Scotland don't have a different blood type than people from Germany. It is all European. You seem to be upset because the process for this is not going the way YOU want it to. But you don't even know what you are doing in the first place, so...... What you need to do is take time to learn the proper way how the process works instead of getting upset because it isn't working the way you want it to.
2016-03-27 02:16:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a differing ratio among different ethnic groups as to blood type. However, each of the four blood type are possible in each race.
2006-07-11 23:55:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ѕємι~Мαđ ŠçїєŋŧιѕТ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Every race (not ethnic group) would have a unique DNA in all their living cells but the blood group categorisation remains the same accross the Human race.
2006-07-12 01:03:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by suruchi 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
the gens are different, u mean that?
every ethnic group has an "own" gen. but the most interesting thing is, that people in India, have all the gens from the other ethnic groups in them. it's fact.
2006-07-11 23:44:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by zaraza 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is not true....
Some races are more of one blood type than another, but there is not one specific blood type for each race.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/vary/vary_3.htm
Hope this helps
2006-07-11 23:44:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lynda C 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
WORLD BLOOD TYPES
A Dendrite of World Populations by Blood Groups
[Article by Andis Kaulins - using the data of Kelus and Lukaszewicz
in Hirsfeld, Probleme d. Blutgruppenforschung, Fischer Verlag]
The study of ancient mankind - YOUR history and mine, is increasingly an interdisciplinary science. The results of one branch of research must bear up to the burden of proof required by the results derived from other branches of study.
For example, whatever the results of linguistic and archaeological research may be, they will be increasingly scrutinized by other branches of science which do not deal in (what is often only) academic opinions, but in irrefutable physical facts.
One such group of facts which relates to the origins and dispersal of mankind and its languages throughout this planet - is blood data. Theories about ancient cultures and discussion about the migrations of ancient peoples will increasingly have to conform to blood data provided by the physical sciences.
We, who live in this world of DNA know that our TRUE history is etched indelibly in our genes - and in this technological age, we are increasingly in a position to read our past simply in our bodily chemistry. Or to put it in other words, we carry the answers to age-old questions about the origins of man WITHIN us. The so-called "gene pool" is reconstructable far back into the past.
Hence, we provide here a graphic which presents unavoidable FACTS. They are not the opinions of well-meaning scholars nor are they subject to challenge or change. They simply exist. Hence, theories about ancient cultures and languages which do not conform to these facts CAN NOT be true, and only those which DO conform to these facts CAN be true, although agreement does not guarantee that they ARE true.
Did you try your hand at getting the right solution? How do your numbers read from top to bottom? The odds against you getting them all right are against you - unless you are a specialist in the field of blood groups.
The correct solution, running from top to bottom in the grey box above, is:
10-1-11-3-9-6-8-2-5-4-7
There were some surprises, weren't there?
The worst scores were probably obtained by linguists and archaeologists - whose pervading theories simply DO NOT match up with the evidence of the physical sciences. The reason for this is clear. Archaeology forms its theories based on what they dig up and this is a fairly serendipity undertaking, which relies much on chance. Linguistics, up to now, is still in its baby shoes, and many of the so-called "rules" which have developed will one day be put to test in computers - using the hypotheses derived - and I for one, doubt whether many of them will work - at least not in the historical sense. New directions in e.g. Nostratic support this view.
The dendrite used here is a mathematical method of bringing ALL interrelationships on one contiguous branched line. It shows how far each group of people is from others (i.e. the length of the lines is also mathematically calculated and significant). Dotted lines mean the relationship is clear, but that the exact distance is, as yet, mathematically uncertain. Here is how the dendrite graph looks completely filled out:
The completed dendrite tells us clearly how man developed and how he scattered throughout the Earth, starting in Africa, moving northward and then branching to the East and West. Indeed this conforms with topographical data since the Alps and the mountains of Asia presented insurmountable obstacles in ancient times.
The direction of dispersal ran basically along the old Amber Trail, across the flatlands from the Black Sea to the Baltic and from thence in all directions.
This also conforms to the fact that the Baltic languages are the oldest Indo-European tongues - and, since BALT in Latvian means "white" (the old BALT inscriptions in Phoenician are transcribed as LE BA'AL'AT "the noble - white - lady"), we see here the basic line of development between the whiter-skinned paled-out races of the north and their darker-skinned sun-basked neighbors to the south (this comment is meant neutrally and NOT racially). The axis lies on the trail from Africa to the BLACK SEA and from there to the BALTIC SEA, and the color descriptions are surely ancient.
The Arabs, as shown by the blood data, must then be a mixture of whites and Africans - as perhaps recounted in the Bible - i.e. Abraham and his 2nd wife.
Oriental scholars and Egyptologists will eventually have to take these distributions of blood groups into account, especially since the blood groupings of Egyptians and Hebrews simply defy all current academic theories about the origins of the Pharaohs and the Hebrews, so also in linguistics, archaeology, religion and ethnology. Nothing could be more clear from this data, than that the Hebrews and Egyptians have a nearly common blood origin and that their geographic origin lies in the broad expanses of northern Eurasia - probably at the time of the Great Flood (see Noah's Flood by Pitman and Ryan).
2006-07-12 21:51:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by ~Untold Wisdom~ 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not exactly; see the chart at
http://www.bloodbook.com/world-abo.html
and the maps at
http://anthro.palomar.edu/vary/vary_3.htm
2006-07-11 23:46:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Atomin 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
uhm no not quite, I wouldn't listen to whoever these people are if I were you
2006-07-11 23:44:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋