I dont know. But here is the article from Times of India.
Pakistan's swift and all-to-quick condemnation of the Mumbai blasts and its commiseration with New Delhi notwithstanding, all eyes are on Islamabad's militaristic leadership to see if it has ceased to use terrorism as a state policy against India.
Several analyses that have appeared in the western media in the hours after the blasts are examining Pakistan’s long and malignant sponsorship of terrorism and coddling of groups like the Lashkar-e-Taiba that has resulted in India, and increasingly western countries, bearing the brunt of violence and mayhem.
Many commentators are concluding that the blasts bear the imprint of LeT with possible links to Al Qaeda.
"No group has yet claimed responsibility, but LeT has been increasing its campaign against New Delhi in recent months in an effort to undermine India's sovereignty over the Kashmir region," the intelligence forum Stratfor wrote in its analysis.
"A sophisticated, coordinated attack in an urban area outside of Kashmir has not been in LeT's playbook in the past, although it could have borrowed a page from al Qaeda," Stratfor said. "This kind of cross-pollination is inevitable as militant groups exchange ideas, tactics and personnel."
Analysts also worried about how long India, Indians and the Manmohan Singh government could withstand the constant pressure from militant groups before they react.
"By any measure of international diplomacy, they've already been extraordinarily patient," Xenia Dormandy, a former National Security Council official said in a Washington Post op-ed, comparing India’s restraint with Israel's response to the kidnapping of its soldier or to the US and Japanese responses to North Korea's missile tests.
"Now is a moment when Pakistan really needs to respond," Dormandy wrote. "Until Pakistan -- and this means not only President Pervez Musharraf but also the military, the people and the political parties, including the religious party, the MMA -- gets serious about shutting down, arresting and otherwise dismantling the militant groups that operate from its territory, it cannot expect to be treated as a responsible player in the region."
Western analysts carefully sifted through reports from Mumbai to suggest that the operation -- seven blasts in eleven minutes at different stations -- was too sophisticated for a simple homegrown cell to execute and that it was possibly backed by outside forces, including foreign intelligence services.
Pointing out that blasts were all in first class compartments typically used by the "Indian financial class that is overwhelmingly Hindu," one analyst said it was clearly aimed at hitting the Indian economy.
US analysts also pointed out that the LeT had now spread its tentacles worldwide, with young Muslim men of Pakistani origin as far apart as US, Australia, Canada and Europe going for terrorist training to Pakistan, where support for Let is widespread.
"With such attitudes quite alive and well in Pakistan, the immediate condemnation of the Bombay bombings by the Pakistani government Tuesday evening is welcome, but is not nearly enough," one analyst said.
"The continued proliferation of the jihad ideology that fuels Lashkar’s activities as unmistakably as does the money that pours into its coffers from Pakistan and the West also cannot be ignored indefinitely," Robert Spencer wrote in the FrontPageMagazine .
"We may hope that this will move anti-terror officials to shed more light on its international terror-recruitment and terror-financing activities."
But unfazed by such negative commentary and repeated implication of Pakistan in terrorism worldwide, the country’s foreign minister Khurshid Kasuri distastefully suggested that the bomb blasts pointed to the need for India to negotiate with Pakistan on the Kashmir issue (see accompanying story)
Meanwhile, the US Department of Homeland Security said it is closely monitoring the bombings in Mumbai, amid reports that American transit systems are in high alert for similar attacks.
"At this time, there is no specific or credible intelligence suggesting an imminent threat to the homeland or our transit systems," Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chernoff said.
"We will work with individual transit agencies that may choose to increase their vigilance, as a matter of prudence, at this time. More generally, we continue to strengthen mass transit security throughout the country." In yet another show of support from the Bush administration, Chernoff said the US "will continue to stand with India in the war against terror."
2006-07-12 06:09:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by DDS, MS 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Mahatma Gandhi:: He let the muslims stayed in the country when the Britishers were telling him and other idiots politicians what is good for India.
Congress Party: Till today the same policy continues of appeasing the muslims. So they can do any thing and everything.
Please don`t blame Kashmiri militants for these blast. They only want independence from a country which cannot defend itself (so how it will defend them- Half the Kashmir is annexed by pakistan and Indians could not do any thing).
2006-07-11 20:51:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jonu S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
P.S. Pasricha, director accepted of police for Maharashtra state, the placement Mumbai is placed, also revised before lack of existence toll figures, putting forward that 183 human beings were killed by technique of the blasts and 714 injured. ''We had an concept pondering some months that Mumbai grew to change right into a purpose,'' he cautioned journalists. ''because it truly is the business enterprise capital, there are a variety of of weak parts contained in the city. aims are properly commonplace.'' Suspicion for the blasts today fell on Kashmiri militants - specially the Lashkar-e-Tayyaba crew, which have contained in the previous employed on the point of-simultaneous explosions to attack Indian cities. This crew in assciation with an area muslim pupil crew (SIMI?) are suspected of starting to be plans this attack.
2016-12-01 03:03:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by catucci 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The types of devastations that Mumbai witnessed on 7/11/2006 is just one of the thousands of incidents India has gone through. Though staying in the US we get to see and hear only what the media portrays and as mentioned in http://ia.rediff.com/news/2006/jul/12nri.htm?q=tp&file=.htm , not much we can do about it sitting here; one thing that I have decided is to stop spending any of my money at any Pakistani restaurant/store which would potentially aid the ruthless acts. May be my I am very critical in my comments and I am not sure how helpful my resolution would be for the cause I have in mind; but I shall certainly not be the NRI who thinks "There is nothing I can do, and it hurts"
PS: Check out http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=70951
Pass it on to your friends if U agree with the message
2006-07-12 13:16:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a challenge for the agencies who are supposed to deal with such cases.
Leveling easy allegations against neighboring countries is not very professional.
You know where you hit it hurts.
Just look at your targets, they might have made you the target.
2006-07-11 20:43:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Saadi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋