no coz their minds nd hearts r pure.. they have no guilt or shame.. they r just natural.. like adam nd eve were before they ate the apple.. get it?
2006-07-11 19:49:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Animals with furs are not considered to be naked.. The fur is like theit cloths. But animals such as Hippo, Elephant and fish, can be considered as naked. Well, since they have never eat the Fruit of Evil, they are not conscious of the nakeness and not feeling shameful.
So they do not feel embarrasing.
But a mouse without a tails will definately feel embarrased, as it is different from the others lol
2006-07-11 19:51:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by a V a 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Technically 'naked' is a human cultural thing. In several human societies nakedness is quite common, such as in parts of Africa and south America. I know in many parts of south America, tribal men were asked to cover their genitals because it was considered rude to have them hanging out by the European and American scientists/tourists. The men still run around naked, but they have a special 'horn' that covers their penis ^.^ .
With this said, some animals do seem to show 'embarrassment' with being 'naked'. I've heard of parrots, who, after having plucked themselves bald, showed discomfort when their bare areas were exposed to strangers. Just like with culture, it's probably a learned response that no feathers (or no clothes) = bad.
Animals DO know what naked means. They are intelligent enough. it's just that they don't care. It's not a big issue to them, though they can react to different coat types and different colors, depending on the species.
2006-07-11 20:04:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by white_ravens_white_crows 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
All animals are considered dressed as they have their God given fur or otherwise coats. When an animal has their fur shaved off, they would be considered naked. And no, they are not embarrassed. Animals do not have the brain intellect to know what embarrassed means. Animals don't have the brain intellect humans have, but yet they have more understanding and empathy and don't abuse their babies like humans do. Perhaps humans should be more like animals!
2006-07-11 19:54:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think naked is only a term coined for humans.You see,before Adam& Eve ate the forbidden fruit,there was no such thing as being "naked" the serpent was jealous of God's creation and led Eve to believe that it should be covered up ,and that to show too much of it would be wrong and shameful hence the term "naked" having the meaning of;uncovered,not concealed...Give that some thought.
2006-07-11 19:53:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Direktor 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only time when an animal is naked is when we are wearing them as a coat. You know some poor creature is now missing its covering. No I am not a vegetarian, I still like my chicken.
2006-07-11 19:51:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Contesta 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I tell people my dogs are naked when they aren't wearing their collars.
They aren't conscious about it at all. We're the ones who make a big deal about nudity. It's a societal standard. Other animals don't mind because it interferes with their ability to reproduce.
2006-07-11 19:49:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Yah00_goddess 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
animals dont know wrong from right
peopel train them to do what we want
but no shame in their game
why are u thinking about naked animals
oh no i cant stop thinking about them lol sad
are they naked are they
2006-07-11 19:50:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by jrmy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The elusive Pants-Wearing Marmot isn't naked. He knits himself a new pair every weekend. That crafty little bugger.
2006-07-11 19:52:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
interior the initiating God created the intercourse impulses and generative powers interior the 1st guy and female and commanded them to cohabit and placed across forth infants. It replaced into for this reason no sin for the appropriate pair to have sexual intercourse. besides the undeniable fact that, whilst Adam and Eve disobeyed God, no longer interior the undertaking of intercourse kin, yet in ingesting the forbidden fruit, drastic adjustments happened. without warning their accountable sin-bothered consciences made them conscious of their nakedness, and that they on the instant coated their genital organs from God’s sight. (Ge 3:7, 10, 11) From then on, adult adult males ought to no longer carry out the procreative mandate in perfection, yet, extremely, the hereditary blemish of sin and the penalty of dying could be transmitted from the parents to infants. Even the main upright and God-fearing parents produce sin-contaminated infants.—playstation fifty one:5.
2016-12-10 05:11:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They must be naked, and it must be really embarrassing to them and their owners, considering all the cute little pet outfits in the stores these days. :)
2006-07-11 19:50:10
·
answer #11
·
answered by pvpd73127 4
·
0⤊
0⤋