English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-11 18:46:38 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference Words & Wordplay

11 answers

From CNN in May of this year...

Chicken and egg debate unscrambled
Egg came first, 'eggsperts' agree

Friday, May 26, 2006; Posted: 7:33 a.m. EDT (11:33 GMT)

LONDON, England -- It's a question that has baffled scientists, academics and pub bores through the ages: What came first, the chicken or the egg?

Now a team made up of a geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer claim to have found an answer. It was the egg.

Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life.

Therefore the first bird that evolved into what we would call a chicken, probably in prehistoric times, must have first existed as an embryo inside an egg.

Professor John Brookfield, a specialist in evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, told the UK Press Association the pecking order was clear.

The living organism inside the eggshell would have had the same DNA as the chicken it would develop into, he said.

"Therefore, the first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg," he added. "So, I would conclude that the egg came first."

The same conclusion was reached by his fellow "eggsperts" Professor David Papineau, of King's College London, and poultry farmer Charles Bourns.

Mr Papineau, an expert in the philosophy of science, agreed that the first chicken came from an egg and that proves there were chicken eggs before chickens.

He told PA people were mistaken if they argued that the mutant egg belonged to the "non-chicken" bird parents.

"I would argue it is a chicken egg if it has a chicken in it," he said.

"If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would surely be an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg."

Bourns, chairman of trade body Great British Chicken, said he was also firmly in the pro-egg camp.

He said: "Eggs were around long before the first chicken arrived. Of course, they may not have been chicken eggs as we see them today, but they were eggs."

The debate, which may come as a relief to those with argumentative relatives, was organized by Disney to promote the release of the film "Chicken Little" on DVD.

2006-07-11 18:51:19 · answer #1 · answered by m137pay 5 · 0 0

According to Aristotle, actuality takes precedence over (i.e. comes first) potentiality. Eggs become chickens, chickens do not become eggs (chickens lay eggs, they do not become them). Therefore an egg is a chicken in potentiality, an chicken is a chicken in actuality. Therefore the chicken came first.

2006-07-12 06:40:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The chicken, because life was created whole and evolved to have the ability to reproduce

2006-07-12 01:50:43 · answer #3 · answered by n 5 · 0 0

egg. dinosaurs laid eggs before there were chickens

2006-07-12 02:29:23 · answer #4 · answered by Akeja 5 · 0 0

They both came at the same time.

2006-07-12 01:51:13 · answer #5 · answered by dsgc05™ 6 · 0 0

its egg
egg has to develop into chick

2006-07-12 02:30:58 · answer #6 · answered by sahi 2 · 0 0

THE CHICKEN HAPPY DAY

2006-07-12 01:51:07 · answer #7 · answered by Charles W 6 · 0 0

egg.

2006-07-12 01:51:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

dinosaur

2006-07-12 01:50:37 · answer #9 · answered by Quiet Amusement 4 · 0 0

it's god creation! ask GOD when u die! he'll give u the answer!

2006-07-12 02:12:08 · answer #10 · answered by ToDy 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers