1. correct
2. Bush just wants us to believe that he is human, not an ape.
3. definitely correct
But you forgot #4: Bush is a fascist dictator at heart. He is even trying to take away our freedom of speech, one of the most basic rights our constitution gives us.
2006-07-11 20:01:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by metalheart19 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
I think you need to read a few history books. Hitler was not forthright in his intentions with the German people. He lied and weaseled his way into power. Hitler was sooooo smart, he wanted an Arian race of blonde haired, blue eyed people, while he had brown hair and eyes. You call this smart? It is also rumored but not yet proven that his grandfather was Jewish and that he had several homosexual encounters as a young man. How you could write such a question tells me a great deal of things.
1. You are very young or just simply ignorant.
2. You have little knowledge of history.
3. You compare a heartless meglomaniac that slaughtered millions to Bush.
In this day and age, he would have been condemned to a sanitarium and probably spent the rest of his days there. I suggest, my very young friend you read a few books, (unlike Hitler, who burned them, so that the masses would be ignorant)....and be thankfull the Allied Forces won the war, or you wouldn't have a book to read today, let alone cruise the freaking net. Or, for that matter, have an opinion and be able to post this question. Get educated!
2006-07-12 01:48:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do people keep comparing Bush to Hitler?
1) Bush has never and never will kill people based on race.
2) Bush didn't murder millions of civilians in concentration camps because of their religion.
3) Bush is not an evil psycopath.
But seriously, even if you don't like Bush or agree with his policies, can you honestly say he is like Hilter? And can't you people show a little respect to the President?
To any of you that say Hitler was the better man...you make me sick.
I love you too donktheclown
2006-07-12 01:31:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Appono Astos 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush, although you do make a point. However, Hitler's quest for glory killed over 6 million people. Bush, although he has killed many, the number is not that high. Also, Hitler's justification for killing was that he wanted a perfect race, bush is just oil. The furor did hide his evil. He made people think that it was not his fault. However, your last point I cannot disagree with you on. George Bush is defiantly one beer short of a six pack.
2006-07-12 01:32:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This question is somewhat absurd. I am afraid a response it is not worth a response. Yet, a clear difference would be Hitler attempted world domination along with Imperial Japan. If we would like to do the same thing we could easily give it a shot. Induce more young Americans to join the US Armed Forces. Increase military weapons production and begin soliciting allies to fight a war of global domination.
However, that is not what we are doing or about to do. We are not in the business of ethnic cleansing. We are not about to invade a number of countries and include them to the already existing fifty states.
Hitler I'm afraid was not that terribly smart. He made the fatal mistake of preventing Japan from attacking Pearl Harbor enraging the entire nation. Along with invading Russia with the upcoming brutal Russian winter. Instead, if he would have kept a truce with Russia and let the British Empire slowly dissingrate he could have had the entire continent of europe along with all the natural resources and labor of Africa and Asia.
Along with not trusting and killing many of his most prominent generals. And failing to realize the true nature of the Normandy invansion and failing to permit several panzar divisions from the northern areas of France to engage the invading Allied forces.
I think the US wants business and oil. And this busines has a strong voice in the US goverment that is well understood. There is a large percentage of US citizens making a nice living due to high gas prices. Compare profits of the oil companys and motor companies and tell me who is in the red.
2006-07-12 01:45:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by gregory m 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
What are you talking about? Hitler's whole leadership of Germany was one gigantic lie. His propaganda about the motherland and an Aryan race started WW2 and killed over 6 million Jews. I'm in no way a Bush supporter. I think he's the worst president this country has ever had but he doesn't compare in anyway to Hitler, who was one of the most evil men in history.
2006-07-12 01:29:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Travis 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Hitler was the sick bas**** that started the Holocaust. Glory by killing all those people? Some glory. More like murder if you ask me. Bush is not evil. He has not killed anyone because of their race or religion, and he never will. Hitler was a stupid Nazi who was power hungry. There is no comparison. Anyone who says that Hitler was smarter and a better man are sick.
Thank you donktheclown. =]
2006-07-12 01:34:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rachel 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I read all that Hitler garbage and of course he's not him at all.
Not the Hitler we know. Before the Hitler we know, for him to gain power he had to legally take it away from the people - which he did, and which King George is doing right under your nose and you'll wake up one day without a country.
This is the only article I found that explains it correctly, but you have to have time to read the whole thing:
2006-07-12 01:33:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by yars232c 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Hitler hid his intent from his own people for years. He was a decorated hero of the 1st World War who turned ugly. His main policy was deceit.
2. Hitler was fiercely patriotic to his country.. and wanted to rebuild it. However, he was short sighted in that when he focused his attentions on the Jewish people, he cut the country in two and brought the entire world against him (almost the entire world)
3. Hitler was intelligent... he was not smart.
Bush is a great leader, whether it is noticed or not...
2006-07-12 01:31:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Talisman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
hitler was maniac who killedmillions of innocent people who didn't look like he wanted them to....smart or TOTALLY INSANE??
if bush started the war for oil....wich is what i think you were trying to get at in your pitifully worded little question. Then why on earth are we paying outrageous prices at thepump compared to out national average 2 years ago??
bush isn't hiding his evil, depending on what you consider evil, everything bush has done that had a major impact has been highly televised and debated.
yeah, hitler was smart, smart enough to commit suicide before he was caught by the russians in his little hideout and VERY smart for avoiding what the U.S would have done to him for his haneous acts....that is if there was anything left of him.
yes, there is a big difference between bush and hitler.
2006-07-12 01:32:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by jason 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are both evil men. Its just Hitler embraced it and Bush hides it. So I would have to say Hitler was a better man.
2006-07-12 01:29:07
·
answer #11
·
answered by Jacqueline 3
·
0⤊
0⤋