This whole conspiracy thing does not make sense to me.
2006-07-11
17:03:23
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Appono Astos
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Ok Fahrenheit 9/11 will not "open my eyes" so don't even bring it up. I'm not that gullible.
2006-07-11
17:10:05 ·
update #1
Hey POKI POKI I don't have time to sit for an hour and a half to watch a video, plus, I don't speak French.
2006-07-11
18:03:53 ·
update #2
Geez guys quit writing me novels lol
2006-07-11
19:36:17 ·
update #3
What is worse is that the left can't even seperate itself from those who believe this anti American hatred.
One of the facts they loved to raise was the data on all the Israeli (jewish people) who called in sick that day. Well guess what - the number was exactly what the national average was and out of 30,000 some odd people working in the 7 area buildings it was like 110 or something - just like the rest of the country.
And blaming Bush Jr; as I recall he was not president when Osama's men shot down to US helicopters in Somolia and killed US Soldiers and we ran out (BJ Clinton),
And Bush Jr was not president when bombers took out US Embassies in Africa and we responded with a tomahawk cruise missile to an aspirin factory;
And Bush Jr. was not president when al queda operatives slammed a small boat with explosives into the USS Cole and killed US Navy personnel - and we did nothing.
You ignore a misquito long enough and he'll bite some place that hurts.....thanks BJ Clinton.
2006-07-11 17:18:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by netjr 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Somebody at the top of the food chain knew. They knew something.
Why did it happen so early in the morning when there wouldn't be that many people inside the Towers. We lost what 2000 people in the Towers, mostly officers and firefighters. If those planes had crashed into those Towers at 11:00am that number would probably have doubled. There were less people in the buildings at 9am.
Did you notice there was no plane debris in the Pentagon's case?
But a plane did crash there, right? Or not. Not.
And why is it that an Italian film crew just happened to be filming a documentary on the NY fire departmant at the very same time the first plane hit Tower 1? In the direct PATH THE PLANE TOOK?
2006-07-11 17:16:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by sincerely, see me 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are lots of things that indicate 911 was an inside job. There is a law suit by Stanley Hilton where he is suing Bush/Cheney/Rice/and Rumsfield for the attacks of Sept 11,2001 where he stated he has written proof that George W. Bush ordered 911. You can hear a interview that he does with Alex Jones on www.prisonplanet.com.
WTC 7 not hit by any plane yet fell in the same manner as WTC1 and WTC2, Silverstein on PBS admits that WTC 7 was brought down by demolition.
IF the WTC's fell by the pancake theory, then you need to ask yourself why they came down as dust and not in chunks, and why no other buildings next to them were damaged. Also need to ask yourself why they fell in less than 10 seconds. Pancake theory does not hold up. It violates the laws of nature. Specifically gravity. Futhermore when the firefighters transmissions which were not released until August of 2005, they state in those transmissions that the fires were managable and that there were multiple explosions occurring in those buildings. How would 19 arab highjackers have access to those buildings to set explosions? You also need to ask yourself why the tower that was hit last fell first. Seems to me that if was because of the fires that the one that burned the longest would have fell first. Also that steel in those buildings was certified to stand fires up to 2000 degrees F, jet fuel does not burn that hot. If the fires were hot as they were then how could have people trapped in those towers stood in the openings that the planes placed there begging for help?
Then there is the fact that war games were being conducted on Sept 11, 2001 where they mimic planes flying into those buildings. There were at least 12 different war games happening that day. It is what provided the governments cover for their black ops. Don't think our government would do something like this then you need to read the northwoods document that the cheif of staffs proposed to JFK in the 60's to get the American public behind an invasion of cuba. JFK turned them down. But there is an errie resemblance of 911 and those documents.
Also there were alot of signatories on the PNAC document that are now in high offices in our government where they state in their document the new American Century the planning of America's defenses where they state that the implementation of their agenda will be a long and slow process not withstanding a castrophic event such as a new pearl harbor. This was published in Sept of 2000.
Then there is the fact that the patriot act became law six weeks after 911, think they produced that large of a document in six weeks? If they did then how come it takes years to produce any thing like it before? And why were the only 2 senators who were in opposition of it the only two who recieved Antrax in the mail. The Antrax is the same strand that is held by the military? I don't believe in coincidences do you?
The attack on 911 was a direct attack on the American people by the persons who are in power. They are the only ones who could control the media, the cover up, ect.
If 911 was not an inside job then why did it take our government 444 days to start an investigation? The commission that George W. Bush allowed to investigate 911 was underfunded, and had members with direct conflict of intrest and lacked supponea powers. George W. Bush and Dick Cheney testified but not under oath. Why?
If 911 was not an inside job then explain to me why the secret service did not protect the president that day? He was at a publicized location. When he entered Booker elementary school he was told there were possibley 20 airplanes highjacked. Why would they allow him to enter a publicized location? Why would he say he see the first tower attacked when that was not shown? He stated this twice after the attacks? When they did finally remove him from that school, why would they allow air force one to fly over Flordia for 2 hours without any fighter jet support? Think they knew something the rest of America didn't know?
If you are ready to face the truth about 911 then research it on the internet the evidence of it being an inside job is out there. There is an interview done by Micheal Ruppert on st911.org that is very good, and is a strong arguement for it being a inside job. And he uses only the info that has been published in the papers and other media outlets since 911 to support his case. If you continue to believe that it wasn't an inside job then that is on you.
2006-07-11 18:27:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by barbara o 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I cant say it was an inside job, but very powerful people in our intelligence and govt and big money knew something big was going to happen that day.
Can you explain why there was an unusual among of 'shorts' or bets against the market that it would have a big correction?
Someone knew before it happened and made millions upon millions of dollars on the stock market correction. Whats even more suspicious is that the govt refused to subpoena these financial institutions to find out who placed those shorts.....Shouldn't the govt. be curious why these people betted against the market and who they were?
2006-07-11 17:27:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with you and I'm somebody who believes there was a shooter on the grassy knoll.
I don't buy that 9/11 was an inside job. For one thing it worked as planned...something the Bush Administration has never been able to do.
2006-07-11 17:10:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why have such distinct key 9/11 witnesses dedicated "suicide" or died unnatural deaths? Did they know too a lot? It replaced into burn to lack of life,or bounce off a construction have it quick,i am going to dedicate suicide thanks very a lot. 911 comissioner genuinely makes a slip-up and says a missile hit the Pentagon on between the anniversaries of 911: because the plane hit the pentagon,it should be labeled as a missile.
2016-11-01 21:40:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I definitely do not think that it was an inside job, but have you ever thought that perhaps United 93 could have been downed by the military to prtevent it from reaching Washington?
2006-07-11 17:15:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There was no inside Job...The conspiracy was probly to try to keep it covered up..You don't know how close they came to the white house hon.
2006-07-11 17:09:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by ole_lady_93 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
watch the movie Fareinhet 911" that will really open your eyes to different versons of what happened.
2006-07-11 17:08:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because it was not. Anyone who can do it is working in conspiracy theorist land or with choas theory.
2006-07-11 17:07:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋