If women ran the world 100% without male input, would it be kinder or crueler?

Question

What do you think in general? Would there have been peace in the middle east by now or would it have become ancient history? This is only a hypothetical question.

Answer 1

I think it would depend on the woman.

Answer 2

Personally, I think crueler. No offense, but I find most women to be control freaks when they are given too much power. They try to make too big of an issue that "it's a man's world" and that they are so much better and have every right to be in that position. They treat all the men like dirt and try to be too much. Just look at Hillary. ICK!

Answer 3

IF women ruled the world we would have peace because women give life. We hate the loss of one woman's child. We all feel the pain. I think that woman would just isolate combative people until they calmed down That said I would hope that 2 things never happened while we woman ruled.
That we all PMS'd at the same time. Or show up at a world conference wearing the same designer dress. Those two things might just start a war!!

Answer 4

Crueler. Women Are Just As Bad As Men. Except More Bitchy

Answer 5

Women are in a good position how the handle "mother Earth". Thousand years of male leadership has brought an endless constant battles and wars. These guys don't go through PMS but brought with them the seeds of conflicts, hate and wars. Women are life-friendly , being mothers themselves. Nurturing life intead of destroying it. World peace could be a 'real, possibility when this happens. I may not be around to see it but its such a nice idea to keep in our hearts. Women Leaders for World Peace !!!!!!

Answer 6

It's my plan. Yes, it would be so much kinder & gentler that
things would actually get accomplished.
Organization will be second nature.
There would be no war - that's a waste of time, money &
useful men.
It's already happened with a species of geicos. And they've
figured out a way to reproduce.
Yes, we'll have men - but they will have to have a conscience &
be very pleasant about lifting heavy things & fixing our automobiles.
I'm really going to get the heat on this one - thank goodness,
I'm on the second page.
Professor Adam, Rob,Jake & Black Panther - you are safe.
And because you are the only ones who will be allowed,
you will be pampered & treated as kings.

Answer 7

it would've been kinder. Women are psychologically and socially known to be very different than males in respects to the ways they behave in groups and others. Women are known to be more cooperative, more diplomatic, and less violent. So taking into consideration the many wars and battles and bloodshed this world has experienced, i think if they were led by women, things wouldnt have taken such violent turns, rather women would've promoted cooperation and peaceful negotiation between parties. thats just my view, of course if we do look at women leaders throughout history, many of them have in fact been cruel or taken actions that were not exactly "just" or fair. i.e. Indira Ghandi, or female prime minister of Pakistan.

Answer 8

Just as cruel (probably crueller) as if it were run completely by men. Women are guided too much by emotions, and if something went wrong (which is bound to happen when running the whole world) in the female collaboration, it would most likely be interpreted as a threat to personal character or values and anything else in between. Just as I'm glad the world isn't run by men only, I'm just as glad the world isn't run by just women.

Answer 9

I'm thinking that since we hold grudges, there would NEVER be peace in the Middle East! Though we would definitely get more done than Bush! I think the world would seem kinda uptight sometimes, though... guys are usually more laid back than girls. It would kinda suck that way, but I guess some things would be better.

OMGosh lol Keither C's answer cracks me up!

Answer 10

It would be about the same, but with different styles of warfare. War may be over something entirely different, women may be less muscular, but not necessarily less aggressive. I've seen plenty of catfights and manipulation to think that the world would be no worse or better if females ruled the world.

Answer 11

My personal belief is that it would be "kinder". On what do I base this belief? Well, looking at crime statistics, men commit most violent crime (with the victims mostly being women!). I think men have "too much testosterone" or something- they generally would rather take up arms than diplomatically (and peacefully) resolve issues... Men like to "dominate" and "control". I think it's something in their genes (or jeans? LOL!).