and how bush is saying that it should be closed down.does anyone out there believe that?the americans have abused the human rights and tortured those prisoners and now has no use for them.now its trying to show the world that it's law abiding.only a fool or american will believe this crap.
2006-07-11 11:08:24 · 7 answers · asked by machood2002 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Leogirl and Nukelefties ..your stupidity is only surpassed by your hostility towards your fellow Americans.. and by the way you right wing, Gestapo, goose stepping, false patriot fascists..you all need a long lesson in peaceful conduct. First "W" has said repeatedly that prisoners of his war on terror do not qualify for the Geneva convention and that GitMo was chosen specifically because of its geographical location, Second,the war on Terror ended when monkey boy said "mishon ecomplisht" the occupation has since done more to inspire hate for America and her interests than any one thing in history except maybe Hiroshima, Torture is illegal because it violates Human Rights.. weather or not you feel that "lefties" are whiners has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that George W Bush and Darth Cheney have violated every ideal of a free and Democratic people. Elections are coming up and unless your dirty electronic voting machines are successful you will be on the outs and maybe we can get back to some normalcy in this country.. I would rather have an innocent Muslim at my dinner table than one of you any day of the work week.
2006-07-11 11:42:39 · answer #1 · answered by hardartsystems 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Typical Liberal getting ALL the facts wrong. What the President said was he didn't like to have a place like Guantanamo, BUT the alternative is not an option. Unless one of you bleeding hearts would like to take one of these poor souls into your own home. They are going by the Geneva Convention to deal with the prisoners down there. I really don't see where it will be any better for them. But hey.....if it stops that incessant whining from the left, than go for it.
2006-07-11 18:14:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
True, it's becoming a non-issue now, but the important thing is that it sets a precident for the following administrations, as well as future wars waged by the current one. No longer can an Attorney General and a Vice President (and their front-man/pet chimp) claim the Geneva protections don't apply to a group just because it's not in the "best interest" of the US.
2006-07-11 18:17:11 · answer #3 · answered by BarronVonUnderbeiht 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's sick. How the Supreme Court could read the Geneva Convention and even think that the scum in Gitmo is covered by it is beyond me. The Supreme Court, and now MY President, have only helped to make America less safe. As far as how the rest of the world, and you, think about it, I couldn't care less! DON'T EVER FORGET!
hardartsystems - Again, where in the Geneva Convention does it say that non-uniformed combatants are covered by the Geneva Convention? I guess you'd just like to play nice them and maybe we can gather the intelligence that way that helps protect you and your family. As far as dinner, I don't like chicken so please don't invite me.
2006-07-11 18:18:49 · answer #4 · answered by Nuke Lefties 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even Hitler did not renounce the Geneva Convention
2006-07-11 18:18:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why the abuse?its a fair question.maybe it is because of the elections.but the damage has been done and a lot of people (american)dont like being told the truth.
2006-07-11 18:20:10 · answer #6 · answered by ashmuh97 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Elections are coming up, they're trying to convince voters that they are law abiding.
2006-07-11 18:15:34 · answer #7 · answered by fra_bob 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋