Personally, I go for Cassius Clay, Sorry, Ali
2006-07-11 10:54:22 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I know, Heavy6metal9. it was for the benefit of the younger dudes!
2006-07-11 11:00:59 · update #1
I agree with you Cassius Clay it sounds better than Ali
he should of kept it that way,
2006-07-11 10:58:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Muhammad Ali
2006-07-11 13:19:26 · answer #2 · answered by palmreader 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tough call, as you can't sell short Joe Louis, but I have to go with Ali, as Cassius Clay (even though it is the same person) isn't the name listed.
2006-07-11 10:58:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
(b.January 17, 1942) born Cassius Marcellus Clay, Jr. in Louisville, Kentucky, is a retired American boxer.
Cassius Marcellus Clay Jr. changes his name to Muhammad Ali
2006-07-11 10:57:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What looks the false impression right it truly is that technologies is the foremost to a fighter... Oh, so incorrect. it is all about a fighter's heart and their frame of mind. warring parties of the the 20 th century, Jack Johnson as an celebration fought over one hundred circumstances contained in the heavyweight branch and decrease back then there became no round reduce...It became as many 3 minute rounds till the different guy fell... compared to twelve, 3 minute rounds for a Championship wrestle sounds like a cakewalk. There are experienced warring parties today, authentic. yet i'd be keen to placed a hefty guess that in case you took ANY fighter it is at the moment contained in the game today adverse to a Jack Johnson, Jack Dempsy, or Sugar Ray Robinson, it may well be an gruesome day holiday for the recent college. All of those historic warring parties have fought over 80 circumstances with over 50 KO's (Robinson had 108 KO's!!). those adult males were no longer purely combating no one's there occupation, all of them have distinctive boxing hall of repute fighters. everyday, i locate it rediculous that the recent warring parties may have any kind of probability adverse to the finest of the early twentieth century. no longer to tutor that the classic boxing glove in 1900, became 2-3 oz.. health improvements does no longer propose a champions heart or ability set... in case you do not agree, bypass search for some previous fights of Jack Johnson...and Sugar Ray Robinson. I dare absolutely everyone to inform me that someone like Klitschko or Mayweather may stand a probability adverse to those adult males...
2016-12-01 02:16:07 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ali
2006-07-11 10:57:16 · answer #6 · answered by Luvmt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I agree, Mohammed Ali
2006-07-11 10:59:05 · answer #7 · answered by blondie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No doubt Ali
2006-07-11 10:58:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeh gotta be Ali
2006-07-11 12:21:02 · answer #9 · answered by pikapoke_uk 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree, Ali.
There were some other great fighters, but Ali had it all.
2006-07-11 10:57:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋