ESPN or Univision?

Question

Which one did you like better, in terms of World Cup broadcasting?

Answer 1

I like Univision, ESPN sucks they sound like they're at a funeral they need to be more motivated, into the game and have that latin beat...gggggoooooooooooooooooollllll....!!!! instead of just Gol!

Answer 2

Univision. The Mexican commentators can get annoying (and biased) sometimes, and Chilavert's "Si si!" gets on your nerves after a while, but because I don't have satellite, I can't watch any of the Argentine channels, so I just have to deal with it. :P For football, the Spanish channels will always be better than ESPN.

Answer 3

I liked Univison's pre-game shows and thought that the commentaries of Chilavert were spot on but I can't stand the other babbling idiots. ESPN narrative of the game doesn't have the energy and passion of Spanish narrators but at least they know when to shut up and I though Balboa is a good commentator too. so in my concept, ESPN wins by a nose.

Answer 4

ESPN, they showed all of the games I wanted to watch, except for the finals... And if I happened to miss a game, I could hear about it and see highlights on Sports Center. Plus I liked to watch World Cup live... I like Eric Wynalda too... They seemed to have people that knew what they were talking about analyzing and covering games.

Answer 5

I like Univision better... even though I don't understand the language but it's so alive! gooooool,goooool,goooool,goooool,goooool !!

and they telecast longer too. not just the match but the before and after the match too.

Answer 6

if i speak spanish, univision all the way! too bad that's not the case

Answer 7

i think ESPN, but Julie Foudy was really annoying

Answer 8

i liked univision. it was more exciting and of course GOOOOOOOLLLL DE ITALIA! i mean cmon it doesnt get better than that