2006-07-11 07:57:58 · 50 answers · asked by Anonymous in Dining Out ➔ Other - Dining Out
Is good! Dead guy loins are especially succulent----alive guy loins for that matter.
2006-07-11 08:04:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
meat is meat and can't be anything else after conciousness is severed. Hell, I can't see why they don't eat their dead in countries where food is scarcer than the dead - even in Africa, AIDS will be killed by cooking well enough, and besides, if I were dead, I would like to think that I was still useful for as long as possible. Sacred bodies? I say ignorant moralists.
2006-07-11 08:02:42 · answer #2 · answered by ergonomia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he died from the plane crash I don't think there's a moral problem, but it would be a pretty hard taboo to break for most people. By the time you'd be ready to eat him he'd probably be pretty rotten unless your plane crashed in the arctic.
2006-07-11 08:00:25 · answer #3 · answered by Sean 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
grab the crash awl, any first help and survival equipment, any style of hat and outfits which will safeguard me from the elements, disconnect the smash out tapes and take them with me. they're frequently utilized as rope for securing stuff. The crash awl ought to correctly be used to reduce them to smaller sizes if needed. in my opinion, i'd grab as lots of the liquor minis that i ought to get. little need seeing them bypass up interior the submit crash hearth. If time helps, i'd smash the reflect interior the lav and grab a chunk sufficiently large to make a respectable signal reflect.
2016-12-10 08:02:20 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, that happened with some South American soccer (football) team in the Andes. Just make sure he is dead before you start preparing him. Oh, and white wine is recommended, never a Merlot.
2006-07-11 08:01:31 · answer #5 · answered by But why is the rum always gone? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just don't eat the brain or spinal cord and you should be okay (depending on how long the guy has been dead and his health before death). A gross concept, but desperate circumstance calls for desperate measures!
2006-07-11 08:01:27 · answer #6 · answered by thebreakofshawn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That depends on if you are rescued or not. If not rescued and in an isolated area, that dead guy is your main source of protein. The strong will survive.
2006-07-11 08:01:06 · answer #7 · answered by Yngona D 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no good or bad to it. It's a matter of your own survival. A human should do what's necessary to live. However, to kill another person to eat and survive is wrong.
2006-07-11 08:03:15 · answer #8 · answered by kittylove 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I'd be the first one to carve up the victims as soon as I got good and hungry. There's no sense getting weak, sick, and dying unnecessarily. If you die on me you're a prospective lunch, and that's just the way it is, I'm telling you up front.
2006-07-11 07:59:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is better than eating a survivor. But if you eat a dead guy, you should be respectful and poop into a grave.
2006-07-11 07:59:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
unless you are planning of facing this any time soon, I wouldn't worry about it. But if you really want to know the answer, it's up to you. In the eyes of the law it's survival but your own moral laws should decree it.
2006-07-11 08:20:58 · answer #11 · answered by jazzoboist 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋