give me best answer
2006-07-15 11:33:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by KA-BOOM 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. Despite the idea that "being gay is just as good of a life as being straight," it is not. There is a much higher chance of suicide, AIDS (yeah, I know, that's not what you have been told. but do some research on it, don't listen to me. I'm not worried about what you will find), other STD's, and many other emotional and physical problems. The government should not give people benefits to engage in a life that is risky to them and the people around them (sorry, but how can that NOT affect others?). Not to mention that it will NOT stop there. Trust me, or just wait and see. If we legalize gay marriage, it won't be long before polygamy, pedophilia, and all other kinds of "marriages" pop up.
Edit: oh, and we need to start realizing the just because something is our "choice" does not make it right. But I thought people always argue that it is not a choice, it is just a feeling that you have to follow.
2006-07-11 14:52:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Kiko 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Absolutely I believe they should be able to marry the one they love. Why do people have such a big problem with gay or lesbian relationships? Why can't people just be happy for everyone who are in love? Just wondering.
2006-07-11 15:02:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not gay either, but I have a few gay friends (for some reason, gay men are a hell of alot classier than us "normal" guys). I don't see any reason why they shouldn't be married.
Now if you asked should they adopt kids, I'd definitely say "no", but I'd listen to any arguments for it.
2006-07-11 16:14:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Okay...I'm gay and want to get married......everyone here (and MANY others I've talked to) have no issues with me being able to get married......so why do we have so many persons in congress that claim they are following the public when so much of the public has no issues with allowing it???
2006-07-14 05:36:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by lovefinallyfoundme 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If marriage is a religious sacrament, then constitutionally we have no right to establish (or destroy) it by statute. If it is a civil ceremony, a formal manifestation of a civil contract between two competent adults, then what is the justification for not providing statutory guidelines for it?
2006-07-11 14:50:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by antirion 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If that is the choice they make then yes, I thought maybe do the common law thing, if they are together for a certain amount of time, let it be legal.
2006-07-11 14:50:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by slf620 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, you should be able to marry who you love. Americas supost to be free right.
2006-07-11 23:10:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Nicole draws in scribbles 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely. Why should they be treated like second class citizens? Straight people don't take it seriously anyways. (Most of them)
2006-07-11 15:54:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by AleJunkie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, and I'm not gay either.
2006-07-11 14:49:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by logical_centrist 2
·
0⤊
0⤋