I think that, instead of less guns, we need more fathers teaching their children how to use and respect guns. Or, at least that's what my father taught me.
2006-07-11 07:17:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by MornGloryHM 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I probally one the most pro-gun people in America. One of the reasons I am so pro-gun is that shooting is one of the things I am best at and I hope to make a career out of it(assuming the democrats do get back in power). When anti-gun people tell me how "guns kill" I like to act suprised and say "OH MY GOD!, We've putting PEOPLE in jail this whole time!!!" and then just walk away, it's funny and usually works.
2006-07-12 22:28:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that guns need to be controlled to a point. I believe that handguns should be completely banned for civilian ownership. Long guns (hunting rifles and shotguns) should be legal for those who can prove they have a use for them (hunting, predator protection, hobby marksman etc). People who can't prove they have a use for such a thing, shouldn't be allowed to own them. I also think that guns should be kept at centralized locations. When you need to use your gun, you go to that location, specify what you are going to do, when the gun is to be returned, and then you return it when you are done. Guns should not be laying around in peoples homes.
2006-07-11 07:19:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by poecile 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with you. Now I do believe that they should be locked up and away from children. But I do find it to be a basic Amercian right for me to own a handgun to protect my property and family, which I will do at all costs. When they outlaw guns, then only the outlaws will have guns. People kill people, guns don't kill people, if that's true, then pencils misspell words, and spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat.
2006-07-11 07:20:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by cajunrescuemedic 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the damned criminals would only obey the law! Washington D.C. banned guns in 1973, crime is up 70%, London, England banned them around the same time, crime is up 50%. If some pervert breaks into your house at 2 A.M. you better hope he's a nice guy if you can't defend yourself! We recently had a guy that broke into a home near me, he had a gun but so did the home owner, scratch one burgler, he's dead. Oh, I side with you.
2006-07-11 23:53:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mr.Wise 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm all for it. I personally do not and will not ever own a gun. I would prefer that no one else be allowed to have them either. I know that people will get hold of them regardless, but the fewer the better.
2006-07-11 07:17:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gun control is hitting the target.
People who call for "gun bans" are idiots.
2006-07-11 07:16:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by happyharrytick 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it truly is an argument that I actual have extrememly solid thoughts on. i believe that each and each and every regulation abiding U.S. citizen must have the right to personal a gun. i understand human beings say that when the founding fathers wrote "the right to undergo palms" into the U.S. Constitutions the circumstances were distinct, in spite of the indisputable fact that the concept remains an similar. we decide guns to take care of ourselves. Liberals bypass round whining "guns are undesirable, guns kill human beings, we commit to restrict guns." properly guess what, if we banned guns criminals who needed them undesirable adequate may nevertheless locate procedures to get them. Is weed unlawful? Yeah it truly is, yet inspect what number of human beings nevertheless smoke each day. Banning guns may do no longer some thing except strip regulation abiding U.S. voters of potential to guard themselves. look on the Wesleyan capturing that occurred in my state about 2 weeks in the past, the position an innocuous female became killed because some psycho stormed into the position she worked and shot her. If someone in that keep were armed, she may were kept. So what do each and each and every of the liberals who attend that college do?? They bypass protesting adverse to guns on campus. universal liberalistic way of wondering- do not look to the muse of the issue, instead arise with procedures to get peace so no one receives damage and everyone's satisfied. Peace and love is fantastic and dandy till someone comes up and attacks your ***. Then what are you meant to do? i imagine i have rambled adequate so my very last reality is that individuals will always locate procedures to receive a gun, no matter if or not they're unlawful or no longer. Having the right to undergo palms will enable regulation abiding voters to guard themselves even as lives are at stake.
2016-12-01 01:55:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
GUN CONTROL IS USING BOTH HANDS...
2006-07-11 07:16:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
how come in all white countries like Norway theirs no gun crime?
2006-07-11 07:52:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Puzzled 3
·
0⤊
0⤋