Why do most governments sit and watch the bombings and do nothing about it? Why are they so scared to attack the terrorist nations?
America is the only country that acted against the terrorist attacks in a large scale, why cant every country act like that when terrorist attack in their own soil.
2006-07-11 07:08:18 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I like this statement/question. I firmly agree that the decisions of the president and Congress are correct. I think that if we had done nothing... we would simply be attacked again. I wish that there was much more support in our government from the people.
God Bless our Soldiers.
2006-07-11 07:13:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
America reacted by attacking two countries that had nothing to do with 9/11! Is this the kind of stupidity you want to see around the rest of the world?
Why didn't the US attack Saudi Arabia? Hmmmm?
2006-07-11 07:15:19 · answer #2 · answered by poecile 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Other countries do respond, they attack. That's why 9/11 happened. We caused terror, and they attacked us. End of story. And before anybody gets mad, I'm not excusing what happened, New York is my home, I was devastated when the towers fell. But the world today lives by it's own rule, 'an eye for an eye'. We weren't completely innocent, but it's sad so many others had to pay for mistakes they didn't even know about.
2006-07-11 07:22:14 · answer #3 · answered by Agent Double EL 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most countries are VERY proactive about terrorism. (Non 3rd world). Proof? Look at all the countries in IRAQ. Plus, the American Media doesn't really care about what doesn't affect US interests. It doesn't make for good entertainment, hence, you will find NO coverage on any channel. On top of that, Al Quaida accounts for a small percentage of terrorist networks. Most terrorists are domestically grown.
2006-07-11 07:14:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The U.S. reacted by starting a war that was based on a lie with a country that was in no way involved in the 9/11 attacks and then failed to capture the actual person responsible (Osama bin Laden).
2006-07-11 07:12:50 · answer #5 · answered by tangerine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
actually we didn't attack the terrorist nations, most of the 9/11 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia, but the US has good ties with them and depend on their oil
2006-07-11 07:12:54 · answer #6 · answered by CLBH 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pope already did make such coments after 9-11.Pope continuously tells human beings to forgive and 'love your enemies'.yet i do not imagine that should be the reaction of alternative Christians and Catholics who've to wrestle decrease back to live on.And we already are in a 'warfare hostile to terror'.So attacking Vatican does no longer make a lot distinction except possibly gas Christians' and Catholics' anger.in case you do not decrease back in time you are able to kiss Christianity see you later.
2016-10-14 08:54:28 · answer #7 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you shore about that?
Do some search and find out for yourself. This was discover by them first and that is why they attack on this day. In their language they draw, two tall building and a plain with smoke, that when you change that font, it reads 911.
But before they knew it, God knew it first, that is why God was telling us on Psalm 91:1
But people were to busy getting rich and in their abominations
So look and you will find out for yourself.
2006-07-11 07:18:42 · answer #8 · answered by Evy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because most terrorism is not state-sponsored. It's just these secret groups doing it. Unless you can find these secret groups, there's no country to attack.
2006-07-11 07:12:22 · answer #9 · answered by A4Q 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They dont know what to do and second they would rather beleive that terrorists attacts dont take place in their Country.
2006-07-11 07:11:36 · answer #10 · answered by ladya_smith 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋