yes they really did have a baby but i think they want to keep her out of the public eye....i know it is a bit weird that there are no pics of the baby or that even close friends haven't seen her.....maybe Tom has her locked up some where? :)
2006-07-11 06:04:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jessie 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm starting to suspect that there never really was a baby. It's one thing to not release pictures to the public but it's another thing to not let your friends see it. Plus, if you look at the baby timeline, katie Holmes was pregnant for a little too long. She was pregnant for practically a year.
2006-07-11 13:04:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by christigmc 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know i haven't seen baby Suri either. I think it was just a publicity stunt because if they really had a baby like angelina jolie and brittany spears then we would of seen the baby everywhere.
2006-07-11 13:05:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Question? I Got An Answer! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it depends on their religion... That thing is too weird.
Maybe they have to wait days before showin her.
Or Maybe they're just taking some time to stay alone with her...
and not "selling" her pictures to the best offer... for MILLION of dollars... like Brad & Angiolina...!!!
2006-07-11 13:04:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Aredhel 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think they are just being smart and keeping the baby out of the public eye. We don't really know who has seen her and who has not, it's all assumtion and rumor.
2006-07-11 13:03:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by MC 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They're doing what every celebrity wishes they could do, shield their child from the feeding frenzy paparazzi. I don't blame them, I would too if I were in their shoes.
2006-07-11 13:03:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Olive Green Eyes 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i cant believe that there isnt ONE out there. even if katie is getting in car or going to a doc. NOTHING. not even a pic of them holding her. thats wierd
2006-07-11 13:56:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by ~luv my pups!.~ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ooooh, you gotta love conspiracy theories...
Cruise is a manipulative, controlling, psychotic...nothing would suprise me at this point.
2006-07-11 13:03:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by mynx326 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe Maybe not.most likely no.
2006-07-11 13:17:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by ily[; 3
·
0⤊
0⤋