Vince Young all the way. He's got everything and is very skilled talented and determined. Not that Reggie Bush isn't, I just happen to be a Longhorn so I gotta show some love. I hope they both do extremely well, I do not have in doubt in either one of them.
2006-07-11 06:11:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by babygemini261 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
i take vince young here because he was both a hugely productive passer and a great runner. he was also overshadowed by bush and leinart and never really got all the respect he deserved. still, reggie bush is going straight into the action, while vince young will likely have to wait a little bit. reggie bush's explosiveness and versatility will likely make his first season pretty successful, whether at running back, slot man, or special teams guy. if young gets a chance, he may have a little more difficulty as a QB
2006-07-11 22:08:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by blackerican 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vince will be the better player when it's all said and done but Bush will have the better first season simply because it takes
a lot longer for a rookie QB to make the transition from college to the pro's than it is for a running back.
I've seen players like Reggie Bush before, quick explosive athletes with slick moves, reminds me of Marshall Faulk and Barry Sanders.
But Vince Young, he reminds me of know one. Yeah you can say Mike Vick and McNabb, but I have yet to see a QB with Young's package....Great Speed, Strong Arm, Tall, Good Weight, Accurate and poised.
2006-07-11 13:26:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vince Young is a better player but Bush is gonna play right away. Bush has to split crries but Vince will probably not play until week 6-8. Once Vince gets started it will take him some time to get ready so I would say Bush has a better first season. I think that Vince will have a better carea though.
2006-07-11 13:02:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Boom!!! Shock A Locka 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither. Young will take time to groom and going from College to The NFL is a big change and the Titans simply lack the personal to make Young a success. Reggie is with the saints who never really have accomplished anything. I expect Bush will get beat up and banged up as will Young but with the millions of dollars they are making sure it ease the suffering
2006-07-11 17:07:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Zoe 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is the best player - and since Vince will only see the field from the sidelines this year - Reggie will have the better year --- Reggie from the 916 !! Rack Him !!
2006-07-11 13:02:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Josh C 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
"But Vince Young, he reminds me of know one."
-Vince Young doesn't remind me of any NFL quarterbacks, either. At least, none of the good ones. However, as mentioned previously, Reggie Bush has many characteristics of great running backs (speed, power, agility), and displayed his skills in a pro-style offense. Vince has not. (Don't even TRY to tell me Texas ran a pro-style offense.)
"Yeah you can say Mike Vick and McNabb, but I have yet to see a QB with Young's package...."
-How exactly is Vince Young similar to Michael Vick or Donovan McNabb? Did the Falcons and Titans completely depend on a QB keeper/scramble every other play? Bush fits into ANY offensive system, EVEN as a blocking back.
"Great Speed..."
-He has speed (not really great), but everyone has speed in the NFL, including linebackers and some DE's, including Javon Kearse, who will take great pleasure in earholing 'Mr. InVinceable.' Reggie Bush has much more than speed, and will have more blockers when he has the ball.
"Strong Arm..."
-Where is the proof of this? Anyone know Young's number one receiver was in his Junior and Senior years? The tight end, who is very rarely the go-to receiver on any given play, especially in the NFL. The real reason the TE was his number one is he doesn't seem to have the confidence, maybe not the ability, to connect consistently on deep outs, crossing patterns, flags, posts, etc, and has to drop it off to the safety valve. Reggie Bush is effective in any set, or play. Between the tackles, or sweeping.
"Tall, Good Weight..."
-These aren't necessarily advantages, especially when a player has a high center of gravity (Vince does). He also delivers partially side-arm, which doesn't really allow him to take advantage of height. In the NFL, linebackers will feast on him because in the open field, he'll be easy to knock down, and especially in the pocket. He'll drop back, and first of all notice that there aren't and LB's spying him like in college. They'll be in coverage. Not able to find a receiver, he'll take off, only to be under-cut or knocked down most likely for a short gain/loss. Reggie Bush has the advantage there, because he'll have more blockers, and he breaks tackles.
"Accurate and poised."
-I'll give him the accuracy; lobbing to a dragging TE vs. slow college D's. However, it will be much different in the NFL. He won't have linebackers spying on him instead of dropping into coverage. Also, simply scrambling to the corner of the end-zone won't be successful. If he tries that, he'll end up with a concussion. Bush will simply continue doing his thing. He won't need to change his game at all.
2006-07-11 16:07:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by cornfednebraskaneer 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Reggie will probably play much more than Young will so I'll have to go with Bush. Young maybe be a clipboard holder for at least a year. They do not have a great team around Young and throwing him to the wolves early would be a mistake.
2006-07-11 13:31:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Reggie Bush -- Running Backs can develop quickly in the NFL while the quarter back position has a much steeper learning curve.
2006-07-12 09:19:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
reggie for sure, vince is good but not a pro type of player, but he might get better with time, reggie will be good from the start,
2006-07-11 16:26:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dries 3
·
0⤊
0⤋