look on this website: http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/5012/5012_01.asp
and tell me that comic wasn't the stupidest most ignorant attempt to attack harry potter.
2006-07-11 05:41:43 · 12 answers · asked by butter with a touch of scotch 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Comics & Animation
That wasn't directed at Harry Potter. Geesh. It was more against Charmed and Bewitched. (Catch the Samantha reference).
Chick has been attacking witchcraft since the days of "Bewitched", so this isn't inspired by Harry Potter.
The witchcraft of the Bible is much different than Harry Potter or Samantha Stevens. If nothing else, Potter and Bewitched are FICTION.
Anyway, Chick means well, and not all of his tracts are so bad. But, he's definitely not subtle.
2006-07-11 07:02:54 · answer #1 · answered by Iridium190 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
that was some PURE ... POO!! [[just because i didn't feel like cursing]]
im not Christian or anything so i didn't of course nod my head along the whole thing but...
that comic WAS the stupidest most ignorant attempt to attack harry potter and all other shows that are "spreading" witchcraft...
oh well. to each his own.
see this is so completely ridiculous though. if someone who is a strong witchcraft believer condemned being saved and made comics out of it and made it available to the public, can u just imagine what a big SCANDAL it would be!!?!??!
2006-07-13 11:13:14 · answer #2 · answered by chetz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure it was an attack exactly on Harry Potter but it was stupid and it was very Harry Potterish. I think since it was a biblical/religious site maybe it was just a way to get a point across. Who knows...people are strange.
2006-07-11 12:47:36 · answer #3 · answered by catsplayyy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have to read the whole thing to see it's an attack.
I have seen dozens of witchcraft movies, and Harry Potter is the only one that religious people said anything about and tried to ban.
2006-07-11 13:31:51 · answer #4 · answered by Bryan K.S. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lame comic. Nowhere near as good as Harry Potter.
2006-07-11 12:47:34 · answer #5 · answered by ☼Grace☼ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. i didnt read it all
2. i cant say it wasnt because it most likely was, i read my own comics though, ones i write and ones rem write. so i didnt bother reading all of that 'harry potter attack'
2006-07-16 21:46:39 · answer #6 · answered by victor obadiah 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was stupid and ignorant.
Hatin' on Harry is a fundie fad. It sounds like fun and all their friends are doing it.
2006-07-12 15:37:21 · answer #7 · answered by kellyrv_bsa 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's really stupid. but why is it an attempt to attack harry potter??
2006-07-11 12:46:03 · answer #8 · answered by Hermione G. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was a weird comic. I am not sure if I got it.
2006-07-15 19:49:20 · answer #9 · answered by Mrs. Mac 4 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that was the stupidest story i've ever read
2006-07-11 12:46:50 · answer #10 · answered by amy_nhi_nguyen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋